چالش‌های چارچوب حقوقی خسارت محیط زیستی در صنعت نفت و گاز فراساحل

الف) منابع فارسی

- کتاب‌ها

1. هومر (1401). ایلیاد و اودیسه، ترجمۀ سعید نفیسی، تهران: هرمس.

- مقالات

2. ابراهیم فتح آبادی، هادی (1390). معاهدات بین‌المللی در رابطه با جلوگیری از آلودگی محیط‌های دریایی در اثر فعالیت‌‌‌های فراساحلی اکتشاف و تولید نفت و گاز. اکتشاف و تولید نفت و گاز، (۸۲)، ۲9-۲3.
3. حسینی، سیدمحمد و رهایی، سعید (1403). مفهوم و ماهیت مراقبت مقتضی در حقوق بین‌الملل. مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی معاصر، 15(35).

Doi: 10.22034/law.2024.57848.3307

4. رشیدی، مهناز؛ رستگار، آزاده و مشهدی، علی (1400). منبع تعهد به ارزیابی آثار زیست‌محیطی فرامرزی در پروژۀ گاپ ترکیه. مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی معاصر، 12 (22)، 117-144.                                       Doi: 10.22034/law.2021.12956
5. شیروی، عبدالحسین و شعبانی جهرمی، فریده (1397). رژیم بین‌المللی مسئولیت ناشی از آلودگی فعالیت‌های حفاری فراساحلی. مطالعات حقوق عمومی دانشگاه تهران، 48 (2)، 357-377.            Doi: 10.22059/jplsq.2017.236135.1530
6. صالحی، جواد و آل‌کجباف، حسین (1400). مسئولیت بین‌المللی دولت حامی در بهره‌برداری از منابع ناحیه در پرتو بایسته‌های حقوق بین‌الملل محیط زیست. علوم و تکنولوژی محیط زیست، 23 (4)، 201-212.  10.30495/JEST.2020.36357.4296
7. قربانی، مریم و بشیری، معصومه (۱۳۹۳). ارزیابی خسارات زیست‌محیطی به محیط دریایی در اثر عملیات نفتی، اکتشاف و تولید نفت و گاز، (۱۱۳)، ۱۱-۱۷.
8. عباسی تبریزی، فرشته (1400). تحولات حقوق بین‌الملل در خصوص جبران خسارت ناشی از آلودگی‌های نفتی. حقوق و مطالعات سیاسی، 1 (4)، 330-344.

Doi.org/10.22034/jlps.2021.4.6

ب) منابع انگلیسی

- Books

9. Buga, I. (2018). Modification of Treaties by Subsequent Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

• Veronica, F. (2007). ‘The European Community and Marine Environmental Protection in the International Law of the Sea: Implementing Global Obligations at the Regional Level‌’, London: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Harrison, J. (2017), ‘Saving the Oceans through Law: The International Legal Framework for the Protection of the Marine Environment’, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

12. Lyons, Y. (2012). ‘Transboundary Pollution from Offshore Oil and Gas Activities in the Seas of Southeast Asia’ in Warner, R. and Marsdenm, S. (eds), ‘Transboundary Environmental Governance in Inland, Coastal and Marine Areas’, London: Ashgate.

• Scovazzi, (2012). “Maritime accidents with particular emphasis on liability and compensation for damage from the exploitation of mineral resources of the seabed”, In de Guttry A. et al (Eds), International disaster response law, Asser Press, The Hague, The Netherlands.
• Redgwell, C. & Boyle, A. (2009). ‘International Law & the Environment’, 3rd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Roach, A. (2013). ‘International Standards for Offshore Drilling’ in Nordquist, M. et al (eds), ‘The Regulation of Continental Shelf Development: Rethinking International Standards’, London: Brill.

- Papers

• Cameron, P. (2012). “Liability for catastrophic risk in the oil and gas industry”, International Energy Law Review, Volume 6, 207-219.
• Chabason, L. (2011). “Offshore oil exploitation: a new frontier for international environmental law”, IDDRI; SciencesPO, Working Paper N°11/11, available at: https://www.iddri.org/sites/default/­files/import/publications/wp-1111_chabason_offshore.pdf (accessed by 3/3/2023)
• Chen, L. (2016). ‘Realizing the Precautionary Principle in Due Diligence’, Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies, 25, 1.
• Dupuy, P. M. (1999). ‘Reviewing the Difficulties of Codification: On Ago’s Classification of Obligations of Means and Obligations of Result in Relation to State Responsibility’, European Journal of International Law, 10.
• Harrop, S. R. and Pritchard, D. J. (2011). ‘A Hard Instrument Goes Soft: The Implications of the Convention on Biological Diversity on Biological Diversity’s Current Trajectory’, Global Environmental Change, 21.
• IJlstra, T. (1990). ‘Pollution from Offshore Installations: The Kuwait Protocol’, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 8.
• Kashubsky, M. (2006). ‘Marine Pollution from the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry: Review of Major Conventions and Russian Law, Part 1’ 151 Maritime Studies

23. Lyons, Y. (2011). ‘Offshore Oil and Gas in the SCS and the Protection of the Marine Environment’, Centre for International Law, National University of Singapore, Available at: https://cil.­nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/OG_SCS_CIL-Part206oct­2011-1.pdf (accessed by 3/3/2023).

• Plakokefalos, I. (2013). ‘Prevention Obligations in International Environmental Law’, Yearbook of International Environmental Law, Amsterdam Law School Research Paper, 37, Amsterdam Center for International Law, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/­abstract=2290211
• Rochette, J. Wemaëre, Matthieu, Chabason, Lucien, Callet, Sarah, (2014). Seeing beyond the horizon for deepwater oil and gas: strengthening the international regulation of offshore exploration and exploitation, IDDRI, SciencesPO, Study N°01/14, available at: https://www.iddri.org/sites/default/files/import/publications/st0114_jr-et-al._offshore-en.pdf (accessed by 3/3/2023).
• Tanaka, Y. (2017). ‘Costa Rica v Nicaragua and Nicaragua v Costa Rica: Some Reflections on the Obligation to Conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment’, Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law,
• Trouwborst, A. et al. (2017). ‘International Wildlife Law: Understanding and Enhancing its Role in Conservation’, BioScience, 67.
• Young, M. A. Rioseco, S. and Andrés, S. (2015). ‘Evolution through the Duty to Cooperate: Implications of the Whaling Case at the International Court of Justice’, Melbourne Journal of International Law 1, 16.

- Regulations, Guidelines, and Advisory Opinion

• United Nations Convention on the Law of The Sea
• Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area (Advisory Opinion) (2011) ITLOS Rep.

31. International Law Commission (ILC) ‘Draft Articles on Prevention of Transboundary Harm From Hazardous Activities’ UN Doc A/56/10 (11 May 2001).

• International Law Association (ILA) Study Group on Due Diligence in International Law, ‘First Report’ (7 March 2014).
• Nicaragua V Costa Rica) (Judgment) (2015) ICJ Rep 665 (Costa Rica V Nicaragua Cases), Separate Opinion of Judge Dugard.

34. Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina V Uruguay) (Judgment) (2010) ICJ Rep 14 Para 204 (Pulp Mills).

• Request for an Advisory Opinion Submitted By the Sub‐Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC) (Advisory Opinion) (2015) ITLOS Rep 4

36. South China Sea Arbitration (Philippines V China) (12 July 2016) (PCA Case No 2013‐19) ICGJ 495.

• ILA Study Group on Due Diligence In International Law (2016) Second Report.
• International Law Commission (ILC) ‘Draft Articles on Prevention of Transboundary Harm from Hazardous Activities’ UN Doc A/56/10 (11 May 2001).

39. The 1990 International Convention on Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response and Co-operation.

• Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, Annex I.

41. The 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity
42. The Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species
43. The Convention on Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Convention)
44. the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling

• Code for the Construction and Equipment of Mobile Offshore Drilling Units
• IRENA, ‘New IRENA Platform Supports Renewable Energy Innovation, Quality and Collaboration’ (6 July 2015).]

47. IMO, ‘Guidelines for the Application of the Revised MARPOL Annex I Requirements to Floating, Production, Storage and Offloading Facilities (FPSOs) and Floating Storage Units (FSUs)’ Resolution MEPC.139 (53) (22 July 2005).

• The MOX Plant Case (Ireland v. United Kingdom) 2001.
• Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North‐East Atlantic (adopted 22 September 1992, Entered into Force 25 March 1998) 2354 UNTS 67 (OSPAR) Appendix I.