Recall, Case Study of the United States Legal System

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Master’s student of public law at the University of Illinois, USA

2 Assistant Professor, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran

Abstract

In many legal systems based on direct or semi-direct democracy, some means of popular supervisory mechanisms, including popular initiative, referendum, and recall, are envisaged. Recall is one of the modern popular supervisory methods that, while identifying the representative body, tries to remove the incumbent before the end of his/her term of office. This practice is still unknown and not used in the constitutions of many countries, but considered highly beneficial in a democratic environment. The main question of the present study is the essence of this legal entity by studying it in the legal systems of several states and federal level of the US. For this purpose, in this article, after recognizing the background and classification of recall with regard to the types of monitoring, the mandatory conditions and typology of this process will be discussed. The typology of recall includes its sorts in terms of justified reasons or grounds, signature collection threshold to start the election, and the how of the filling the position of the ousted official or the recall election methods. In some cases, the legislature, taking into account the circumstances, by anticipating the grounds excludes this process from an exclusively political process, which requires the provision of reasons. As a categorizer, one of the distinguishing features of recall is that, unlike other constitutional supervisory tools such as expulsion and impeachment, it is exercised outside of the ruling forces and by citizens. This article tries to introduce the recall, its background and types, evaluation of the recall, a plan to modify the problems raised by the opposition, and finally the possibility of the recall at the federal level of the US legal system.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. الف) منابع فارسی

    - کتاب‌ها

    1. طباطبایی مؤتمنی، منوچهر (۱۳۹۶). حقوق اساسی، تهران: بنیاد حقوقی میزان.
    2. قاضی شریعت‌پناهی، سید ابوالفضل (۱۴۰۰). حقوق اساسی و نهاد‌های سیاسی، تهران: بنیاد حقوقی میزان.
    3. هاشمی، سید محمد (۱۳۹۹). حقوق اساسی جمهوری اسلامی، تهران: نشر میزان.

    - مقالات

    1. عامری، زهرا و حبیب‌نژاد، سید احمد (۱۳۹۹). بررسی حق برکناری مقامات منتخب توسط مردم در نظام‌های حقوقی، پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب، ۷(۴)، ۹۴.

    Doi: 10.22091/CSIW.2020.5782.1876

    1. شفیعی سردشت، جعفر و گرجی ازندریانی، علی‌اکبر و فاضلی‌نژاد، جواد (۱۳۹۷).‌ کژتابی مفهومی نظارت در نظام حقوقی ایران، حقوق اداری، ۶(۱۶)، ۷۰.
    2. ولایی، علی و نوبهار، رحیم (۱۴۰۲). جایگاه اصل صحت در ارزیابی صلاحیت داوطلبان انتخابات در نظام جمهوری اسلامی ایران، مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی معاصر، ۳۰(۱۴)، ۲۷۷.

    Doi: 10.22034/LAW.2022.49902.3067

    ب) منابع انگلیسی

    - Books

    1. Altman, David (2011). Direct Democracy Worldwide, New York: Cambridge University Press.
    2. Altman, David (2019). Citizenship and Contemporary Direct Democracy, New York: Cambridge University Press.
    3. Arnon, Harel (2008). The Theory of Direct Legislation, New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC.
    • Barber, Benjamin R. (2004). Strong Democracy, Participatory Politics for a New Age, First Edition. Los Angles: University of California
    • Bird, Frederick & Ryan, Frances (1930). The Recall of Public Officials, New York: MacMillan.
    • Cronin, Thomas (1999). Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum and Recall, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    • Garner, Bryan A. (2009). Black`s Law Dictionary, Ninth Edition, Dallas: West A Thomson Reuters Business.
    • Haskell, John (2001). Direct Democracy or Representative Government, First Edition, Boulder Colorado: Westview Press.
    • Ketcham, Ralph (2003). The Anti-federalist Papers and Constitutional Convention Debates. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
    • Montesquieu, Charles (1989). The Spirit of Laws, London: Cambridge University Press.
    • Munro, William (1912). The Initiative, Referendum and Recall, New York: D. Appleton and Company.
    • Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (2002). The Social Contract and the First and Second Discourses. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
    • Scalia, Antonin, & Garner, Bryan A. (2012). Reading Law, an Interpretation of Legal Texts, Saint Paul, Minnesota: Thomson/West.
    • Wilcox, Delos Franklin (1912). Government by All the People: The Initiative, the Referendum and the Recall as Instruments of Democracy. New York: The Macmillan Company, Stanford Library.
    • William, B. Munro (1912). The Initiative, Referendum and Recall. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
    • Zimmerman, Joseph F. (2013). The Recall, Tribunal of the People, Second Edition, Albany: University of New York Press.

    - Articles

    • Abbott, Frank Frost (1915). The Referendum and the Recall Among the Ancient Romans, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 23(1), 89-90.
    • Bowler, Shaun (2004). Recall and Representation Arnold Schwarzenegger Meets Edmund Burke, University of California, 40(3), 205. Doi: 10.1080/00344890408523266.
    • Briffault, Richard (1985). Distrust of Democracy, Columbia Law School, Texas Law Review, 63, 1352.
    • Garrett, Elizabeth (1997). Who Directs Direct Democracy?, The University of Chicago Law School Roundtable, 4(17), 19.
    • Keane, John (2019). The Age of Monitory Democracy and The Greening of Politics, Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 15(1), 43-52.
    • Kelly, R. & Coleman, C. & Johnston, N. (2014). Recall Elections, Parliament and Constitution Centre.
    • Lund, Nelson (2004). Rousseau and Direct Democracy, George Mason University School of Law, 13(2), 497.
    • Madison, James (1787). Federalist No. To the People of the State of New York.
    • Serdült, Uwe (2015). The History of a Dormant Institution: Legal Norms and the Practice of Recall in Switzerland, Ritsumeikan University, 51(2), 3. Doi: 10.1080/00344893.2015.1056219.
    • Twomey, Anne (2011). The Recall of Members of Parliament And Citizen`s Initiated Elections, UNSW Law Journal, 34(1), 43.
    • We the People, Thoughts on the Preamble of the U.S. Constitution (2014). Center for the Study of the American Constitution.
    • Welp, Yanina & Castellanos, Ana Sofia (2020). Understanding the Use of Recall Referendum; Evidence From Ecuador, International Political Science Review, 41(3), 335-348. Doi: 10.1177/019251211­9830373.
    • Weinstein, Rachel (2005). You`re Fired!, The Voter's Version of The Apprentice: an Analysis of Local Recall Elections in California, Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 15(1), 139.

    - Judicial Decisions

    • Burton v. United States, 202 U.S. 344 (1906)
    • Cole v. Webster, 103 Wn.2d 280, 285, 692 P.2d 799 (1984)
    • Cook v. Gralike, 531 U.S. 510 (2001)
    • Gordon v. Leatherman 450 F.2d 562 (5th Cir. 1972)
    • Kotar v. Zupan, Kotar v. Zupan 658 P.2d 1095 (Mont. 1983)
    • Palmer v. Hart, 201 Mont. 526, 530, 655 P.2d 965, 967 (1982)
    • Powell v. McCormack, 395 U.S. 486 (1969)
    • The Coalition for Economic Equity v. Wilson 110 F.3d 1431, (9th Cir. 1997)
    • S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995)
    • Westpy v. Burnett, 82 N.J. Super. 239, 197 A.2d 400 (N.J. Super. 1964)

    - Websites

    • Cowen, Jill (2021). How Much was Spent on the Recall? One Estimate: Nearly Half a Billion Dollars. <https://www.google.com/­amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2021/09/15/us/calfornia-recall-election-co­st-money.amp.html>
    • Chemerinsky, Erwin & Paulsen, Michael Stokes, Interpretation: The Preamble, <https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/preamble/­interpretations/37>
    • Kelly, Martin (2020). Why the Articles of Confederation Failed, <thoughtco.com/why-articles-of-confederation-failed-104674.>
    • Spivak, Joshua, What is the History of Recall Elections?, the George Washington University, <https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/­1660>
Jurisprudence and Islamic Law
Volume 14, Issue 33
December 2024
Pages 33-71

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics