A Comparative Study of Extended Civil Sources in the Legal System of England, Ireland and Iran

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Criminal Law and Criminology, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran

2 Associate Professor of Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran

10.22034/law.2023.52887.3158

Abstract

Globalization led to the removal of borders, and as a result, new forms of crime came to the fore; furthermore, new tools to deal with it were also established in legal systems. Among these institutions, which are often used to deal with transnational organized crimes, is extended civil confiscation. The extended civil confiscation system of England and Ireland are among the leading legal systems in this field. In Iran's legal system, the "law on dealing with the property of ministers and employees approved in 1337", the "law on amending the anti-money laundering law approved in 1397" and the "law on adding articles to the law on the implementation of the forty-ninth principle (49) approved in 1399" are the closest system in Iran's legal system. Confiscation by the extended civil confiscation system is considerable. In this study, for the purpose of optimization of the legal system governing the confiscation of property related to crime in the Republic of Iran, with a comparative view, the components of the extended civil confiscation system in the legal systems of England and Ireland are described, and based on the resulting approach, effective suggestions for the purpose of reforming the laws governing the property related to crime are offered.  In the comparative approach, "criminal behavior", "reduction of the value of evidence" and "revolutionary revolution" are considered three components of extended civil confiscation. Ambiguity in the "Equality of Arms Standard" in the issue of the method of proof, ambiguity in "Reduction of Probative Evidence" and lack of "Necessary Provisional Agreements" to optimize the implementation of extended civil confiscation can be counted among the damages of the legal system governing extended civil confiscation in Iran's legal system. It should be noted that this research was conducted with a descriptive-analytical method and uses the library method in collecting sources.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. الف) منابع فارسی

    - کتاب‌ها

    1. پاک‌جو، افشین و آقامحمدی، منصور (1390). آشنایی با اصول استرداد دارایی‌های ناشی از فساد، تهران: رسانه تخصصی.
    2. پالیزیان، مهدی (1397). تحولات تحصیل دلیل در جرم اقتصادی پولشویی با رویکرد تطبیقی اسناد بین‌المللی و مقررات ایران و انگلستان، شاهرود: دانشگاه آژاد اسلامی.
    3. دلیر، حمید (1386). اموال مرتبط با جرم در حقوق ایران، انگلستان و اسناد بین‌الملل، تهران: دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
    4. ساکی، محمدرضا (1390). حقوق کیفری اقتصادی،تهران: انتشارات جنگل.
    5. محمدی، حمید (1375). ضبط، مصادره، و استرداد اموال، تهران: گنج دانش.
    6. ملازمیان، مسعود (1387). سیاست جنایی تقنینی ایران در جرایم اقتصادی، تهران: انتشارات جاودانه.
    7. مؤسسۀ موج (1389). سیاست‌های ضدفساد در آسیا و اقیانوسیه، تهران: نشر مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس.
    8. نورزاد، مجتبی (1389). جرایم اقتصادی در حقوق کیفری ایران، تهران: انتشارات جنگل، جاودانه.

    مقالات:

    1. احدی، فاطمه ،کرمانیان، پریوش (1400).امکانسنجی عملیاتی کردن نهاد معاملۀ اتهام در ایران با تأکید بر مدیریتگرایی حقوق کیفری، مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی معاصر. 12(22)،22-1. DOI: 22034/LAW.2021.12948
    2. صانعی، سعید، حسینی، سید حسین؛ سیدزاده ثانی، سید مهدی (1401). ارجاع مادۀ ۴۵ الحاقی قانون مبارزه با مواد مخدر به فقه کیفری؛ تحدید یا توسعۀ سیاست کیفری سخت‌گیرانه، مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی معاصر، 13(27). 148-123.

    DOI: 10.22034/LAW.2021.45826.2891

    1. غمامی، مجید (1401) جستاری تطبیقی در اوصاف نظام دادرسی مطلوب، مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی معاصر، 13(27)149-170. 22034/LAW.2021.46656.2929 DOI:
    2. یوسفیان شوره‌دلی، بهنام (1389). رویکرد نوین نسبت به اموال مجرمین در بزهکاری سازمان‌یافته یا اقتصادی مطالعۀ تطبیقی در حقوق ایران و فرانسه، تحقیقات حقوقی. 3(13).

    - گزارش‌ها

    1. گزارش جلسۀ 183884 مجمع مشورتی فقهی شورای نگهبان مورخ 6/3/1397 و 7/3/1397. ص 1 و 2.
    2. گزارش اظهار نظر مجمع مشورتی حقوقی شورای نگهبان در خصوص لایحۀ قانون مبارزه با پولشویی، کد گزارش 9703028؛ تاریخ انتشار 8/3/1397.

    ب) منابع انگلیسی

    - Books

    • Brussels )2014(. Center for the Study of Democracy, Disposal of Confiscated Assets in the EU Member States, Press: Laws and Practices.
    • FATF )2018-2012). International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation, Paris: published by FATF.
    • FATF )2018). President's Paper: Anti-money Laundering and Counter Terrorist Financing for Judges and
      Prosecutors      , Paris: Published by FATF.
    1. FATF (2018). Methodology for Assessing Compliance with the FATF Recommendations and the Effectiveness of AML/CFT Systems Paris: published by FATF.
    • FATF )2012(. BEST Practices on Confiscation(Recommendations 4 and 38 and A Framework for Ongoing Work on Asset Recovery Paris: Published by FATF.
    • Grant Shapps)2006(,The Report Underperformance of the Assets Recovery ,press:hi/uk_politics.
    • Guy Stessens, (2000). Money Laundering: A New International Law Enforcement Model , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
    • Home Secretary, (2016). Amber Rudd’s Speech on Economic Crime at the Financial Conduct Authority Annual Crime Conference PRESS: gov.uk/government.
    • Jon Petter Rui / Ulrich (2015). Sieber;Non-Conviction-Based Confiscation in Europe, Berlin: Max Planck
    • Klentiana Mahmutaj, (2009). Cash Forfeiture Following Acquittal: ‘An Affront to Public Perception’ or a Breach of a Fundamental Human Right? Press: Criminal Law Review
    • Rui JP de Figueiredo Jr.(2011). The Civil Asset Forfeiture Approach to Organized Crime: Eucrim.
    • Stefan D. Cassella؛ (2013). Asset Recovery: The American Experience that Appeared in Eucrim, The European: Criminal Law
    • Articles
    • Anthony, Kennedy, (2004). Justifying the Civil Recovery of Criminal Proceeds, Journal of Financial Crime.
    • Alagna, (2015). “Non-Conviction Based Confiscation: Why the EU Directive is a Missed Opportunity, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research.
    • Sofia Milone, (2017). On the borders of criminal law. A Tentative Assessment of Italian ‘‘Non-Conviction based Extended Confiscation, New Journal of European Criminal Law, Volª The Author(s). Reprints and permissionssagepub.co.uk/journals Permissions.
    • Stefan, Cassella, (2008). The Case for Civil Forfeiture, Why in Rem Proceedings are an Essential Tool for Recovering the Proceeds of Crime. Journal of Money Laundering Control.

    - Cases

    • Judgmental Procedure According to the Supreme Court in F McK. v AF and JPMF (2005). 2 IR 163
    1. Judgmental Procedure Imran Ahmed v HMCRC (2013). EWHC 2241 (Admin) (49).
    • Judgmental Procedure )InSerious Organised Crime Agency v Hymans (2011) EWHC 3332 (QB).
    • Judgmental Procedure )Murphy v M(G) (2001). 4 IR 113, at Para 108.; CAB v Kelly & Anor (2012) IRSC 64 , para 32;
    • Judgmental Procedure,Gilligan v CAB (1998) 3 IR 185 , paras 78 – 101, confirmed by the Supreme Court on Appeal inMurphy v M(G) (2001). 4 IR 113 , paras 71–127.
    • Judgmental Procedure McK v D [ 2004 ] 2 ILRM 419 .
    • Judgmental procedurePer Williams J in SOCA v Gale and Others (2009) EWHC 1015 (QB) (17). This Approach was Confirmed in SOCA v Coughlan (2012). EWHC 429 (QB) (14).
    • Judgmental Procedure Per Williams J in SOCA v Gale and Others (2009) EWHC 1015 (QB) (17). This Approach was Confirmed in SOCA v Coughlan (2012). EWHC 429 (QB) (14).
    • Judgmental Procedure the Director of ARA and Others v Green and Others (2005) EWHC 3168 (Admin) (33).
Jurisprudence and Islamic Law
Volume 14, Issue 32
September 2023
Pages 65-96

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics