An Analysis of Civil Procedures Game Theory with Emphasis on Cooperative Procedures Game

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Azad University, Karaj Branch

2 MA in Economic Law, Allameh Tabatabaei University

Abstract

Game theory is a branch of applied mathematics in which practical
solution in strategies of each reactor has direct impact on other reactors
decisions. Therefore, there is an interior dependence between reactors
that have an influence on the result of the game. Game theory is actually
meant to analyze players profit based on the game theory. The civil
procedures game theory is to analyze the civil gamers' behavior.
However, interchangeable factors such as either party's expectations
from judicial system, their incomplete information, incompetent trial
regularity as long as illogical motivations can misdirect the procedures
of "choice of strategy" and lead to unwanted and unpleasant trial results.
Civil games can be cooperative and uncooperative. In an uncooperative
civil game theory each reactor's choice of strategy will be conservative
which leads the result to be no predictable or "win-lose". On the
contrary, through a cooperative civil game theory each gamer is aware of
other gamer's procedures. Their information will be partly shared, so the
results wil be predictable and "win-win." This article , focuses on the
concept and the basis of the game theory and the effective factors on the
game and types of civil procedure games along with a focus on
cooperative game procedure.

Keywords

References

  1. فارسی

    1. حبیبی درگاه، بهنام (1392)، حقوق و اقتصاد،انتشارات جنگل جاودانه.
    2. دادگر، یداله (1389)، مؤلفه‌ها و ابعاد اساسی حقوق و اقتصاد، انتشارات پژوهشکدۀ اقتصاد دانشگاه تربیت مدرس و نور علم.
    3. عبدلی، قهرمان (1392)، نظریه‌بازی‌ها و کاربردهای آن، انتشارات سمت.
    4. گلاسر، ویلیام (1384)، نظریه انتخاب، ترجمۀ فیروزبخت، مهرداد، نشر رسا.
    5. الماسی، نجادعلی و حبیبی درگاه، بهنام «بررسی اصول حاکم برقوانین کارآمد از منظر تحلیل اقتصادی حقوق»، مجلۀ اندیشه‌های حقوق خصوصی، دورۀ 8، شمارۀ 19، زمستان 1391.
    6. ورنون، کاترین و الیوت، کاترین (1384)، نظریه انتخاب عمومی، ترجمۀ جسمی، یوسف و دیگران، مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی.
    7. یکانگی دستگردی، وحید، «تئوری بازی‌ها»، دانشنامۀ اقتصاد شهر، شمارۀ 8، زمستان 1389.

    ب) خارجی

    1. Arthur J., Jacobson, (2008), “Origins of The Game Theory”, Cardozo Law Review, Vol.20.
    2. Baird D, (1994), “Game Theory”, Harvard University, Press.
    3. BranislavL.Slantchev, (2008), “Game Theory: Static and Dynamic Games of Incomplete Information”, University of California.
    4. Cooter, Robert, (1989), “Economic Analysis of Legal Disputes and Their Resolution”, Journal of Economic Literature.
    5. Cornu, Gerard, (1991), “lesprincipesdirecteurs du proce civil par eux-memesm, fragment d,unetatdea questions”, mélanges Pierre bellet,paris,litec.
    6. Douglas G.Baird, RobertGertner, Randal, Picker, (1998), “Game Theory and The Law”, Harvard University Press.
    7. Eric B.Rasmusen, (2008), “Game Theory and the Law”, Edward Elgar Pub.
    8. Hazewinkel, Michiel, (2001), “Game Theory”, Springer.  
    9. Herbert, Gintis, (2005), “Behavioral Game Theory and Contemporary Economic Theory”, Analyse & Kritik 29.
    10. Hodgson M, Geoffrey, (2013) “On the Limits of Rational Choice Theory”, University of Hertfordshire.
    11. Holden,Livia, (2011), “Culture, Expertise and Litigation: Pathern, Conflicts, Narratives”, Routledge Publication, USA.
    12. Katarzyna ,Zbiec, (2006), "Conflict and Cooperation in Terms of Game Theory", Bialystok University.
    13. Nash, John, (1951), “Non – cooperative Games”, The Annals of Mathematics, Second Series, Vol.54, Issue 2.
    14. Nebel, Bernhard, “An Introduction  to Came Theory : Strategic Games”, at: http://.www.Uni-friburg.de,p.33.
    15. Png, Ivan, (1983), “Strategic Behavior in Suit, Settlement and Trial”, The Bell Journal of Economics.
    16. Randal C., Picker, (1993), “An Introduction to Game Theory and the Law”, Chicago Working Paper in Law & Economics.
    17. Rasmusen, Eric, (2006), “Law and Game Theory”, at: http://www. rasmusen.org/papers/pdf.
    18. Richard, Thaler&Christine, Jolls&CassR. Sunstein, “A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics”, Stanford Law Review, Vol 50.
    19. Robert, G. Bone, (2002), “The Economics of Civil Procedure”, Foundation Press.
    20. Schelling, Thomas C, (1960), “Strategy of Conflict”, Harvard University Press.
    21. Straffin. Philip, (1993), “Game Theory and Strategy”, Published in Washington by The Mathematical Association of America.

    Wolfgang, Ryll, (1996), “Litigation and Settlement in a Game With Incomplete Informati

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics