A Critical Examination of the Tension between Consumer Rights and Intellectual Property Rights

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor, Law Department, Jahrom University, Iran

10.22034/law.2025.67548.3493

Abstract

The rapid advancement of intellectual phenomena and their pervasive expansion have led to their intersection with other domains—including consumer rights. However, the inherently monopolistic and protectionist nature of intellectual property rights has challenged both established economic frameworks and consumer protection regimes. From a legal perspective, a nuanced understanding of the interplay between intellectual property doctrines and consumer rights is crucial for effective regulation, policy formulation, and economic governance in any society. Against this backdrop, the present study seeks to address a fundamental question: What role can consumers occupy within the intellectual property ecosystem? This article elucidates the conceptualization of the consumer within the framework of IP law while highlighting the ostensible discord between these two legal constructs. The tension arises from two competing propositions: (1) the promotion of innovation through exclusive rights allocation, and (2) the realization of economic efficiency by maximizing consumer welfare. The study demonstrates that, contrary to initial appearances, intellectual property rights are not inherently antithetical to consumer rights in the long term. Rather, the resultant monopoly is not absolute, and mechanisms such as the fair use doctrine, exhaustion of rights (first-sale doctrine), and compulsory licensing can substantially recalibrate the balance in favor of consumers.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. الف) منابع فارسی

    کتاب‌ها

    1. آزادی، محمدرضا (1391). حقوق کاربری مصرف‌کننده. تهران: مجد.
    2. اولوآ، ژان کاله و تامپل، آنری (1393). حقوق مصرف. ترجمه و تحقیق: مجید ادیب. تهران: بنیاد حقوقی میزان.
    3. رهبری، ابراهیم و حسنی سنگانی، وحید (1398). حقوق رقابت در عرصه مالکیت‌های فکری. جلد اول. تهران: سمت.
    4. غفاری ‌فارسانی، بهنام (1398). حقوق رقابت و ضمانت اجرای مدنی آن. تهران: بنیاد حقوقی میزان.

    مقالات

    1. براری چناری، یوسفو قاسمی‌حامد، عباس (1398). مطالعۀ تفصیلی مفهوم مصرف‌کننده در حقوق ایران با مطالعه تطبیقی دستورالعمل‌های اروپایی و حقوق فرانسه و انگلستان.دانش حقوق مدنی، 8 (16)، 75-86.  Doi:30473/clk.2020.45303.2523
    2. حبیبا، سعید و شاکری، زهرا (1392). سه‌گام، آزمونی فراروی مصرف‌کنندگان آثار ادبی و هنری.تحقیقات حقوقی، 16 (62)، 209-248.
    3. حبیبا، سعید و مظفری، محبت (1396). دکترین استیفای حق در حوزۀ علائم تجاری با نگاهی بر حقوق مصرف‌کننده. مطالعات حقوق خصوصی، 47 (4)، ص 631-646.

    Doi:10.22059/jlq.2017.225579.1006854

    1. حیدریان دولت‌آبادی، محمدجواد و مظاهری کوهانستانی، رسول (1399). جایگاه حقوق مصرف‌کننده در پرتو اسناد حقوق بشری و رویه قضایی. مطالعات حقوق بشر اسلامی، 9 (18)، 9-30.
    2. شاکری، زهرا (1394). استفادۀ منصفانه از آثار ادبی و هنری؛ حقی برای جامعه؟! مطالعات حقوق خصوصی، 45 (2)، 207-223.  Doi:22059/jlq.2015.54445
    3. عادل، مرتضی و غفاری فارسانی، بهنام (1389). قلمرو اِعمال قوانین حمایت از مصرف‌کننده و عوامل مؤثر بر آن، بخش اول. مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، 1 (1)، 159-181.

     Doi:10.22059/jcl.2010.80794

    1. ملکی، مسلم و پورمحمدی، شیما (1402). مطالعۀ تطبیقی مدیریت جمعی حقوق مؤلف در آثار موسیقایی.حقوق اسلامی، 20 (76)، 137-163.
    2. یوزباشی، سید احد؛ مولایی، یوسف و عباسی، عادل (1399). مطالعۀ تطبیقی حمایت از مصرف‌کننده بعدی در حقوق ایران و ترکیه.مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی معاصر، 11 (21)، 299-325.

    Doi: 10.22034/law.2020.12639

    ب) منابع انگلیسی

    Books

    • Nzuki Munywoki, Munywoki (2021). Consumer Protection Regimes in Kenya with Specific Interest on The Role of Competition and Intellectual Property Law, A Research Project for the Degree of Master of Laws, (The University of Nairobi).
    • Ramalho, Ana & Angelopoulos, Christina (2011). Crossroads of Intellectual Property: Intersection of Intellectual Property and Other Fields of Law (Intellectual Property in the 21st Century), (Nova Science Pub Inc; UK ed. Edition).

    Articles

    • Abdel-Ghany, Mohammed & Silber. & Silber, Norman I (2002). The High Cost of Invention: Patent Law and the Consumer Interest, Deane School of Law at Hofstra University, 13 (4), 18-23. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship/908
    • Benkler, Yochai (2000). From Consumers to Users: Shifting the Deeper Structures of Regulation Toward Sustainable Commons and User Access, Federal Communications Law Journal, 52 (3), 561-579.
    • Beer, Jeremy de, (2017). Making Copyright Markets Work for Creators, Consumers and the Public Interest, in R. Giblin, & K. Weatherall, What If We Could Reimagine Copyright?, Australia: ANU Press.
    • Bhosale, Smith (1999). Strengthening Consumer Protection Against Abuse of Intellectual Property Rights, Advocate Khoj, Online: Section 9 of Trademarks Act, Available at: https://www.advocatekhoj.com/blogs/­index.php?bid=8964fe94b5f7ff5f527071527&bcmd=VIEW
    • Billy, Alexander, & Sukhatme, Neel U. (2024). Perception Pending: What Do Patents Signal to Consumers?, 1-39. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4471087
    • Birmingham, Robert L (1969). The Consumer as King: The Economics of Precarious Sovereignty, Faculty Articles and Papers, 20, 354-377.
    • Brown, Lucas (2019). Intellectual Property Rights Require A Balancing Act: The Exhaustion Doctrine and Patentee Rights Vs. Consumer Protection, Wake Forest Bus. & Intell. Prop. L, Vol. 19, 203-224.
    • Costello, Róisín A. (2020). Conflicts Between Intellectual and Consumer Property Rights in the Digital Market, European Journal of Law and Technology, 11 (1), 1-57.
    • Dusollier, Severine (2010). The Relations between Copyright Law and Consumers’ Rights from a European Perspective, European Parliament Publication, 1-39. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=­2127736
    • Elkin-Koren, Niva (2007). Making Room for Consumers under the DMCA, Berkley Technology Law Journal, 22 (3), 1-27.
    • Fillman, Emma (2023). Comprehensive Right to Repair: The Fight Against Planned Obsolescence in Canada, Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies, 32 (5), 123-156.
    • Girard, Annick & Thorpe, Colleen; Durif, Fabien & Robinot, Élisabeth (2018). Obsolescence of Home Appliance and Electronics: What is the Role of the Consumer?, Équiterre [Perma.cc/MNK2-Z5UE] [Girard].
    • Graves, Jim (2011). Who Owns a Copy?: The Ninth Circuit Misses an Opportunity to Reaffirm the Right to Use and Resell Digital Works, Cybaris an Intell. Prop. L. Rew., 2 (45), 27-53.
    • Hovenkamp, Herbert J. (2014). Consumer Welfare in Competition and Intellectual Property Law, All Faculty Scholarship, 9 (2), 53-68. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1830
    • Helberger, Natali (2008). Making Place for the iConsumer in Consumer Law, Journal of Consumer Policy, 31, 385-391.
    • John T., Cross, & Yu, Peter K. (2008). Competition Law and Copyright Misuse, Drake Law Review, 56, 427-462.
    • Katz, Ariel (2013). Copyright and Competition Policy, Handbook on the Digital Creative Economy, Published in: Ruth Towse and Christian Handke, eds, Handbook of the Digital Creative Economy (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elga), 209-221.
    • Kunder, Sadhana S., Ronald, Bindu & Rajesh, Shivani (2022). Consumer Protection under Competition Law Highlighting Relevant Market Issues under Digital Market, International Journal of Health Sciences, 6 (S5), 11752-11762. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6n­S5.11054
    • Lee, Jyh-An & Li, Yangzi (2019). The Obscure Consumer in the Chinese Intellectual Property Law, European Intellectual Property Review, 42 (1), 56-65. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=­3498255.
    • Laurinavičius, Alfonsas (2012). Modernization of Intellectual Property Protection to Ensure Consumers Rights, Intellectual Economics, 6 (4), 427–438.
    • Leclerc, Jean-Marc (1999). Reforming Anti-Dumping Law: Balancing the Interests of Consumers and Domestic Industries, Mcgill Law Journal / Revue de Droit de Mcgill, 44.
    • Liu, Joseph P (2003). Copyright Law’s Theory of the Consumer, Boston College Law Review, 44 (25), 397-431.
    • McKenna, Mark (2012). A Consumer Decision-Making Theory of Trademark Law, L. Rev., 98, 67-142. Available at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/1112
    • Oriakhogba, Desmond Osaretin, & Olubiyi, Ifeoluwa (2022). Intellectual Property Regime and Consumer Protection, In book: Compendium of Consumer Protection Law in Nigeria Publisher: Princeton & Associates Publishing Co. Ltd, 314-350.
    • Owoeye, Olasupo Ayodeji (2014). Compulsory Patent Licensing and Local Drug Manufacturing Capacity in Africa, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 92, 214-219.
    • Pope, Alexander B. Pope (2011). A Second Look at First Sale: An International Look at U.S. Copyright Exhaustion, INTELL. PROP.L., 19(1), 201-203. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/jipl/­vol19/iss1/8
    • Pope, Alexander B. (2019). Intellectual Property Rights Require A Balancing Act: The Exhaustion Doctrine and Patentee Rights Vs. Consumer Protection, Wake Forest Bus. & Intell. Prop. L, Vol. 19, 198-228.
    • Rajoria, Krati (2022). Consumer Protection in India and Intellectual Property Rights: An Analysis, Intellectual Property Rights in Knowledge Era: Changing Contours, ISBN: 978-93-91088-21-7, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4266688
    • Rao, R. Venkata, & Sharma, Prakash (2022). Intellectual Property and Consumer Laws: Conflicts, Crossroads, and Solutions, 1-12. Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4296754
    • Rosenblatt, Elizabeth (2013). Intellectual Property’s Negative Space: Beyond the Utilitarian, St. U. L. Rev., 40 (3), 440-486.
    • Schroeder, Catherine (2024). Owning a Piece of the Cloud: Intellectual Property and Consumer Protection, The George Washington Law Review, 83 (1), 240-272.
    • Singh, Amit, Suman, Tulip, & Thripura, (2015). Interfaces and Synergies between Intellectual Property Rights and Consumer Protection Law in India: An Analysis, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (4), 201-209. 
    • Steppe, Richard (2018). Abuse of Rights and Patent Trolling: Amicus Certus in re Incerta?, Jura Falconis, 53 (3), 314-388.
    • Stazi, Andrea (2010). Intellectual Property and Consumer Law in the Knowledge Economy, Diritto di Autore, 2 (4), 1-20.
    • UNCTAD (2016). Manual on Consumer Protection, United Nations Publication, Printed in Kenya.
    • Van Dijk, Niels (2010). Property, Privacy and Personhood in a World of Ambient Intelligence, Ethics of Information Technology, 12 (1), 53-68.
    • WIPO (1983). The Role of Industrial Property in The Protection of Consumers, WIPO Publication.
    • WIPO (2011). Interface Between Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Law, WIPO at: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/­mdocs/mdocs/en/cdip_4/cdip_4_4rev_study_inf_2.pdf Accessed 18 October 2021.