A Comparative Study of the Nature of the Right of Hokr and the Right of Acceptance in Islamic Religions Based on the Statutory Laws of Islamic Countries
Assistant Professor, University of Religions and Denominationsm, Qom, Iran
10.22034/law.2024.62500.3398
Abstract
Hokr is one of the emerging issues in Islamic jurisprudence, which is reflected in the laws of Islamic countries and is known as one of the rights that are subordinate to ownership. The right of ownership is the concrete right that arises for him by leasing the endowment property and ordering the construction of buildings by the tenant. The right to construct a building in the endowment property is granted to the tenant in exchange for a certain amount other than the annual salary. Although hokrin the laws of Islamic countries originates from Islamic jurisprudence, it sometimes has differences with it acceptance is one of the newly developed issues in Imamiyyah jurisprudence, which was included in the post-revolution laws in Iran's legal literature. Acceptance is the payment of a percentage of the value of the endowed property in its rent for the use of the endowed property and the creation of the right to build nobles in the endowed property. The necessity of discussing the nature of Hokr and acceptance is because acceptance was a kind of adaptation of Hokr, and for this reason, it is necessary to examine the substantive distinction of Hokrand acceptance in Islamic jurisprudence and the laws of Iran and Islamic countries. With descriptive and comparative analytical methods, it was found that Hokr, contrary to the right of acceptance, can be assigned in the form of other contracts in addition to the lease contract, and in the jurisprudence of the Islamic schools, unlike the Imamiyya jurisprudence, it is only reserved for unused land. The term of assigning the property is fixed, and in the case of subrogation, the term is indefinite. These distinctions from the receiver show a different aspect from the hokr, which indicates the independence of the receiving institution from the hokr.
سبحانی، جعفر (1389). استفتاءات. قم: مؤسسۀ امام صادق.
- مقالات
احمدی، ابوذر؛ سالارزایی، امیرحمزه؛ خزایی، سید علی (1397). بررسی نهاد حکر در قانون مدنی افغانستان. مطالعات شبه‌قاره، 10 (34)، 12-14. Doi: 10.22111/JSR.2018.4058
اصغری، عبدالرضا و بهشتی توندری، فرزاد (1391). بررسی مبنای فقهی حقوقی حق پذیره (حق تقدیمی). آموزه‌های فقه مدنی،4 (6)، 169-180.
باریکلو، علیرضا و کریمی، هادی (1399). تحلیل حقوقی- فقهی پذیره در اجارۀ زمین وقفی. آموزه‌های فقه مدنی، 12 (22)، 120-126.
جعفری خسروآبادی، نصرالله و رمضانی، سارا (1402). حق پذیره در حقوق ایران و کشورهای اسلامی و بررسی روش‌های جایگزین آن در موقافات. مطالعات تطبیقی حقوق کشورهایاسلامی، 1 (1)، 55-68.
مقدادی، محمدمهدی و فهیمی، زهره (1398). بررسی عوامل و حکم تبدیل وضعیت موقوفه و ادارۀ آن در فقه و حقوق موضوعۀ ایران. مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی معاصر، 10 (19)، 106-126.
Doi: 10.22034/law.2019.11298
ب) عربی
- کتاب‌ها
ابن زکریا، احمد‌بن فارس )1404 ق .(معجم مقائیس اللغة. قم: انتشارات دفتر تبلیغات اسلامى حوزۀ علمیۀ قم.
ابن عابدین، محمدامین (1415 ق). حاشیة رد المختار. بیروت: دارالفکر للطباعة و النشر و التوزیع.
ابن عابدین، محمدامین (1997 م). حاشیة علی بحر الرقیق. بیروت: دارالکتب العلمیة.
ابوجوید، احمد و نمر، احمد (2018 م). العقود الواردة على الأملاک الوقفیة عقد الإجارتین أنموذجاً. دراسات: علوم الشریعة و القانون، (4)، 358-371.
بن ددوش، قماری نظرة (2016 م). حق الحکر فی القانون المقارن و موقف المشرع الجزائری.القانون العقاری و البیئة، 6 (4)، 12-21.
سلیم، سعد و د. أیمن (2011 م). الحکر فی القانون المدنی المصری و التشریعات اللحقة علیه و مدی مشروعیة قرار وزیر الأوقاف رقم 202 لسنة 2009 بإنهائه. الحقوق للبحوث القانونیة والاقتصادیة، 1 (1)، 305-390.
mehryar, M. (2024). A Comparative Study of the Nature of the Right of Hokr and the Right of Acceptance in Islamic Religions Based on the Statutory Laws of Islamic Countries. Jurisprudence and Islamic Law, 15(36), 283-309. doi: 10.22034/law.2024.62500.3398
MLA
mehryar, M. . "A Comparative Study of the Nature of the Right of Hokr and the Right of Acceptance in Islamic Religions Based on the Statutory Laws of Islamic Countries", Jurisprudence and Islamic Law, 15, 36, 2024, 283-309. doi: 10.22034/law.2024.62500.3398
HARVARD
mehryar, M. (2024). 'A Comparative Study of the Nature of the Right of Hokr and the Right of Acceptance in Islamic Religions Based on the Statutory Laws of Islamic Countries', Jurisprudence and Islamic Law, 15(36), pp. 283-309. doi: 10.22034/law.2024.62500.3398
CHICAGO
M. mehryar, "A Comparative Study of the Nature of the Right of Hokr and the Right of Acceptance in Islamic Religions Based on the Statutory Laws of Islamic Countries," Jurisprudence and Islamic Law, 15 36 (2024): 283-309, doi: 10.22034/law.2024.62500.3398
VANCOUVER
mehryar, M. A Comparative Study of the Nature of the Right of Hokr and the Right of Acceptance in Islamic Religions Based on the Statutory Laws of Islamic Countries. Jurisprudence and Islamic Law, 2024; 15(36): 283-309. doi: 10.22034/law.2024.62500.3398
)