Cognitive and Comparative Analysis of the Maritime Performing Party in the Rotterdam Rules

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

PhD in Private Law, University of Judicial Sciences and Administrative Services

10.22034/law.2023.54254.3206

Abstract

Usually, in the international transportation of goods, the carrier uses various forms to transport, an important part of which is carried by sea, and this causes to governing the several conventions in the legal relationship between the shipper and the carrier. The Rotterdam rules have been set up with the aim of harmonizing the rules governing transportation which the carriage of goods by sea is the one forms of transporting proccess . The regulations have chosen the "door to door" regime. Persons who performing or undertake  the obligations on behalf of the carrier or under his supervision in the port to port area are the same as the carrier in terms of liability and defense conditions, and these persons are called the maritime performing  party. The possibility of direct action is an improvement in comparing with prior rules. The present research is an attempt to know what is the performing parties and the rules of them

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. الف) منابع فارسی

    - کتاب‌

    1. میرمحمدصادقی، محسن (1391)، کنوانسیون سازمان ملل متحد در مورد قراردادهای حمل بین‌المللی کلی یا جزئی کالا از طریق دریا، تهران: جنگل.

    - مقالات

    1. تقی‌زاده، ابراهیم و احمدی، افشین (1394). بررسی تطبیقی حدود و مبنای مسئولیّت متصدی حمل و نقل دریایی در کنوانسیون روتردام با کنوانسیون‌های بروکسل و هامبورگ، مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، 6(2)، 443-467.
    2. سیمایی صراف، حسین و یاری، میثم (1390)، قلمرو اجرا کنوانسیون رتردام؛ احتمال تعارض با دیگرکنوانسیون‌ها و عدم پذیرش حق شرط، حقوقی بین‌المللی، 28(45)، 105-138.
    3. فیضی چکاب، غلامرضا و مردانی، محمدحسن (1399)، تحول مسئولیت متصدی حمل ترکیبی، از قواعد حمل مرکب 1980 ژنو تا روتردام 2009، پژوهش حقوق خصوصی، 8(31)، 141-170.  Doi:10.22054.jplr.2019.33560.1938

    ب) منابع انگلیسی

    - Books

    1. Baatz, Yvonne, Debattista, Charles, Lorenzon, Filippo, Serdy, Andrew, Staniland, Hilton, Tsimplis, Michael, (2009). Tthe Rotterdam rules: a practical annotation, London: informa law.
    2. Basu Bal, Abhinayan, (2009). A Critical Evaluation of the Rotterdam Rules: Selected Issues in Perspective, Malmo: World Maritime University.
    3. Hoek, Marian,(2010). Multimodal Transport Law, New York: Kluwer Law International
    4. Rhidian, Thomas, (2014). The Carriage of Goods by Sea under the Rotterdam Rules, New York: Informa Law.
    5. Sturley, Michael F, Fujita, Tomotaka & Van Der Ziel, Gertjan, (2010). The Rotterdam Rules: the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea, London: Sweet & Maxwell.

    - Articles

    1. Atamer, Kerim & Suzel Gunyet,“Construction Problems in the Rotterdam Rules Regarding the Identity of the Carrier”, Meltem Deniz & Guner Ozbek,(2011) The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea, Istanbul: Springer,155-201.
    2. Atamer, Kerim, (2010). “Construction Problems in the Rotterdam Rules Regarding the Performing and Maritime Performing Parties”, Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce,. 41(4), 469-497.
    3. Berlingieri, Francesco, (2009). “A Comparative Analysis of the Hague-Visby Rules, the Hamburg Rules and the Rotterdam Rules”, Paper Delivered at the General Assembly of the AMD, Morocco: Available Online.
    4. Bond, Nicholas (2014). “The Maritime Performing Party and the Scope of  the Rotterdam Rules”, Australian and New Zealand Maritime Law Journal, 28(2),95-116
    5. Delebecque, Philippe, (2010). “Obligations and Liability Exemptions of the Carrier”, European Journal of Commercial Contract Law, 2 (1-2),87-93
    6. Feizi Chekab, Ghlamnabi & Mardani Mohammad Hasan, (2020). " An Evolution on the Multimodal Transport Carrier`s Basis of Liability: From Multimodal Transport Convention 1980 to Rotterdam Rules 2009", Private Law Research, 8(31), 141-170,[In Persian] Doi: 22054.jplr.2019.33560.1938.
    7. Legros, Cécile (2012). “Relations Between the Rotterdam Rules and the CMR” Tulan Maritime Law Journal, 36, 725-740.
    8. Mandić, Nikola & Wolff, Vesna Skorupan (2015). “Maritime Performing Party under the Rotterdam Rules 2009”, TOMS, 4(2), 132-139.
    9. Nikaki, Theodora & Soyer, Barış, (2012). “A New International Regime for Carriage of Goods by Sea: Contemporary, Certain, Inclusive and Efficient, or Just Another One for the Shelves?” Berkeley Journal of International Law, 30(2), 302-348.
    10. Nikaki, Theodora, (2009). “The Statutory Himalaya-Type Protection under the Rotterdam Rules: Capable of Filling the Gaps?” Journal of Business Law.403-421.
    11. Nikaki, Theodor, (2011). “Himalaya Clauses and the Rotterdam Rules”, Journal of International Maritime Law, 17(2), 18-32.
    12. Simaee Sarraf & Yari Meysam, (2012). "General Scope of Application of the Rotterdam Convention: Conflicts of Application with Other Conventions ", International Law Review 28(45),105-138.[In Persian] Doi: 122066/CILAMAG.2011.16949.
    13. Smeele, Frank, (2010). “The Maritime Performing Party in the Rotterdam Rules 2009”, European Journal of Commercial Contract Law, 2(1), 1-23.
    14. Sturley, Michael F, “General Principles of Transport Law and the Rotterdam Rules”, Meltem Deniz & Guner Ozbek, (2011). The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea, Istanbul: springer, 63-87.
    15. Sturley, Michael F, (2016). “What has Become of the Rotterdam Rules”, Association of Transportation Law Professionals, 83(4), 19367-19392.
    16. Taghizaadeh, Ebrahim & Ahmadi, Afshin, (2015). "A Comparative Study on Borders and Basis of Carrier’s Liability under “Rotterdam Rules” with “Hague Rules” and “Hamburg Rules”", Comparative Law Review, 6(2), 443-467. Doi: 10.22059/JCL.2015.55771.
    17. Unan, Samim, (2011). “The Scope of Application of the Rotterdam Rules and Freedom of Contract”, Meltem Deniz & Guner Ozbek, The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea, Istanbul: Springer, 87-107.
    18. Von Ziegler, Alexaander, (2011). “The Liability of the Contracting Carrier”, Texas International Law Journal, 44(3), 309-352.
    19. Zunarelli, Stefano, (2009). “The Carrier and the Maritime Performing Party in the Rotterdam Rules”, Uniform Law Review, 14(4), 1011-1023.
Jurisprudence and Islamic Law
Volume 14, Issue 33
December 2024
Pages 291-318

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics