Comparative Feasibility of the New Sudan State Obligation to Hand Over Omar Al-Bashir to the ICC

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

. Associate Professor Payam Noor University, Tehran

Abstract

The ICC jurisdiction in pursuit of Omar Al-Bashir, deposed President, and cooperation necessity of new Sudanese state in this regard are preceded by a record issue in the Security Council Resolution. The Resolution on the new Sudanese state after Al-Bashir’s depose is still binding to surrender him to the ICC instead of being tried in domestic courts. The comparative feasibility study of this theory, considering the situation of Al-Bashir’s removal from power and the non-membership of the Sudan in the ICC is one of the aims and topics of this paper. The study method is descriptive-analytical and relies on requirements of the Resolution and the ICC Statute. The main question of the research is what the effect of the Resolution components and the Statute on obligation of the new Sudanese state to hand over the deposed president instead of domestic trials are.  The findings of research show that Omar Al-Bashir’s removal from power does not only affect the requirements of the Resolution and the provisions of the Statute, but it also facilitates the handing over and initiation of his trials in the ICC. Therefore, the new Sudanese state, as a successor continues to address the requirements of the Resolution and the Statute to hand over Al-Bashir to the ICC

Keywords


  1. الف) فارسی

    1. امامیان، معصومه و عزیزی، ستار، «چالش حقوقی اجرای قاعدۀ عدم مصونیت سران دولت‌ها نزد دیوان کیفری بین‌المللی: با تأکید بر پروندۀ عمرالبشیر»، پژوهشنامه حقوق کیفری، ش 18 (1397).
    2. برزگرزاده، عبدالحسین و امینی‌نیا، عاطفه، «تداوم عدالت تبعیض‌آمیز و مناسبات حقوقی دیوان کیفری بین‌المللی و شورای‌ امنیت»، مجلۀ حقوقی بین‌المللی، ش 59 (1397).
    3. رمضانی‌ قوام‌آبادی، محمدحسین و بهمئی، منصور، «تحقق عدالت کیفری بین‌المللی در آفریقا؛ موانع و راهکارها»، فصلنامۀ مطالعات حقوق عمومی، ش 1 (1396).
    4. زمانی، قاسم و یعقوبی، اسماعیل، «اتحادیۀ اروپایی و دیوان بین‌المللی کیفری: همکاری و حمایت نهادین»، مجلۀ پژوهش‌های حقوق جزا و جرم‌شناسی، ش 13 (1398).
    5. حبیبی ‌مجنده، محمد و کریمی، سیامک، «دادگاه‌های کیفری بین‌المللی و تحقق دموکراتیک عدالت کیفری»، پژوهشنامۀ حقوق کیفری، ش 2 (1395).
    6. سواری، حسن؛ یونس، صیدی؛ ناصر سرگران؛ فاطمه موسوی‌زاده جزایری، «واکاوی موضع شورای امنیت سازمان ملل متحد در خصوص جنگجویان خارجی»، مجلۀ مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی معاصر، ش 19 (1398).
    7. ضیائی ‌بیگدلی، محمدرضا و باقرزاده، حسن، «نظریه‌های متابعت دولت‌ها از حقوق بین‌الملل از منظر اقناع»، مجلۀ حقوقی بین‌المللی، ش 60 (1398).
    8. محمودی‌ کردی، زهرا، «ماهیت اصول کلی حقوقی و کارکردهای آن در حقوق بین‌الملل»، مجلۀ حقوقی بین‌المللی، ش 58 (1397).
    9. موسوی، فضل‌الله؛ حکمت‌آراء راضیه؛ محمدی، عقیل، «نظام همکاری با دیوان بین‌المللی کیفری در چارچوب قطعنامه‌های ارجاعی شورای‌ امنیت (با نگاهی به وضعیت سودان و لیبی)»، مجلۀ مطالعات حقوقی، ش 2 (1397).

     

    1. میرمحمدصادقی، حسین و رحمتی، علی، «ارتباط و همزیستی دادگاه‌های مختلط (بین‌المللی ‌شده) با دیوان کیفری بین‌المللی و محاکم ملی»، مجله آموزه‌های حقوق کیفری، ش 15 (1397).

    ب) انگلیسی

    - Books

    1. Du Plessis, Max, The International Criminal Court that Africa Wants, (Pretoria, 2010).
    2. Dugard, John, International Law: A South African Perspective, (Juta and Company Ltd, 2011).
    3. Nortje, Windell, South Africa’s Refusal to Arrest Omar Al-Bashir, Forum for International Criminal and Humanitarian Law Policy Brief Series, (Torkel Opsahl Academic, 2017).
    4. Steinberg, H. Richard, Contemporary Issues Facing the International Criminal Court, (Brill, Nijhoff, 2016).

    - Articles

    1. Cryer, Robert, “The ICC and its Relationship to Non-State Parties”, in Carsten Stahn (ed.), The Law and Practice of the International Criminal Court, (Oxford University Press, 2015).
    2. Gillett, Matthew, “The Call of Justice: Obligations Under the Genocide Convention to Cooperate with the International Criminal Court”, Criminal Law Forum, Vol. 23(1-3), 2012.
    3. Kahombo, Balingene, “The Theory of Implicit Waiver of Personal Immunity: Commentary on the Decision on the Obligation for South Africa to Arrest and Surrender President Omar al-Bashir of Sudan to the International Criminal Court”, Journal of Law in Africa, Vol. 18, 2015.
    4. Tan, Yudan, “The ICC's South Africa Non-Compliance Decision: Effect of Security Council Resolution 1593 on Referring the Darfur Situation”, Amsterdam law Forum, Vol. 10(2), 2018.

     

    1. Tladi, Dire, “When Elephants Collide It Is the Grass that Suffers: Cooperation and the Security Council in the Context of the AU/ICC Dynamic”, African Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 7(3), 2014.
    2. Tladi, Dire, “The Duty on South Africa to Arrest and Surrender President Al-Bashir under South African and International Law, A Perspective from International Law”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 13(5), 2015.
    3. Wet, D. Erika, “Referrals to the International Criminal Court Under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter and the Immunity of Foreign State Officials”, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 112, 2018.

    - Documents

    1. International Criminal Court, “Resolution on Strengthening the International Criminal Court and the Assembly of States Parties”, Case No. ICC-ASP/10/Res.5, 2011
    2. International Criminal Court, “Decision Pursuant to Article 87(7) of the Rome Statute on the Failure by the Republic of Malawi to Comply with the Cooperation Requests Issued by the Court with Respect to the Arrest and Surrender of Al-Bashir”, Case No. ICC-02/05-01/09, 2011b.
    3. International Criminal Court, “Decision under article 87(7) of the Rome Statute on the Non-Compliance by DRC with the Request by the Court for the Arrest and Surrender of Al-Bashir”, Case No. ICC-02/05-01/09-195, 2014.
    4. International Criminal Court, “Decision on the Prosecutor’s Request for a Finding of Non-Compliance against the Republic of Sudan”, Case No. ICC-02/05-01/09-227, 2015.
    5. International Criminal Court, “Decision under Article 87(7) of the Rome Statute on the Non-Compliance by South Africa with the Request by the Court for the Arrest and Surrender of Al-Bashir”, Case No. ICC-02/05-01/09-302, 2017a.
    6. International Criminal Court, “Decision under Article 87(7) of the Rome Statute on the Non-Compliance by Jordan with the Request by the Court for the Arrest and Surrender of Al-Bashir”, Case No. ICC-02/05-01/09-309, 2017b.
    7. United Nation, “Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide”, 1948.
    8. United Nation Security Council, “Resolution”, No. 593, 2005.