A Comparative Study of the Confidentiality of Deceased Persons’ Medical Information

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, University of Tehran

2 Master's student in Private Law, University of Tehran

Abstract

Confidentiality of medical information is a principle that has been accepted in various legal systems, but all discussions so far have been conducted around the preservation of medical information of living patients. Hence, there is some doubt about the need to preserve or not preserve the medical information of the deceased. The fact that the law is not transparent has also contributed to this issue. The nature of death makes it difficult to extend the provisions of the principle of confidentiality of medical information of the alive patients to the deceased since, apparently, there is no need for the deceased to preserve its medical information. There is a view that the deceased has become dust, and dust does not and is not hurt. In other words, he/she has no awareness or feeling; thus, why should we support his medical information? But the issue is not so simple, and the public interest of the living individuals could be the most vital factor in justifying the preservation of deceased medical information. However, this principle does not seem to be absolute and it has, in some cases, exceptions as far as bias against the principle of confidentiality sometimes jeopardizes the public health and safety of society. In this article, the applicability of confidentiality with regard to the deceased is explained and we analyze the basis and exceptions and mention how this principle is reflected in the legal systems of the UK, the United States and Iran.

Keywords

References

  1. الف) فارسی

    - کتاب‌ها

    1. کاتوزیان، ناصر، اعمال حقوقی: قرارداد-ایقاع، (تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار، چ 15، 1395).
    2. کاتوزیان، ناصر، فلسفۀ حقوق: تعریف و ماهیت حقوق، ج 1، (تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار، چ 8، 1395).
    3. مولودی، محمد و شعبانی‌کندسری، هادی، قائم مقامی در قراردادها، (تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار، چ 1، 1395).
    4. میرشکاری، عباس، حقوق ثبت احوال، (تهران: میزان، چ 2، 1393).

    - مقالات

    1. آسمانی، امید و ابراهیمی، صدیقه، «رازداری در علوم پزشکی»، اخلاق و تاریخ پزشکی، ش 6 (1392).
    2. پرویز، محسن و احتشام، فاطمه، «سیر تطور رازداری پزشکی از مطلق بودن به نسبی شدن به روایت تاریخ»، فرهنگستان علوم پزشکی، ش 2 (1397).
    3. حاج زاده، هادی، «آشنایی با مفاهیم حقوق عمومی: بررسی مفهوم منفعت عمومی»، پژوهشکدۀ شورای نگهبان، (1393).
    4. کاظمی، محمود و عسگر رمکی، جمشید، «مفهوم و مبانی قائم مقامی ورثه: مطالعۀ تطبیقی در حقوق ایران و فرانسه»، دوفصلنامۀ علمی حقوق تطبیقی، ش 2 (1398).
    5. مقدادی، محمدمهدی و دلاوری، محمدحسین، «مسئولیت مدنی ناشی از افشای اسرار پزشکی در حقوق ایران و کامن لا»، فصلنامۀ حقوق پزشکی، ش 30 (1393).
    6. منصوریان، ناصرعلی و شیبانی، عادل، «مفهوم منفعت عمومی و جایگاه آن در قانونگذاری ایران»، دیدگاه‌های حقوق قضایی، ش 75 و 76 (1395).
    7. میرشکاری، عباس و مظفری، خدیجه، «مسئولیت مدنی ناشی از ورود زیان بدنی به متوفا»، مطالعات حقوق خصوصی، ش 2 (1396).

     

     

    ب) انگلیسی

    - books

    1. Feinberg, Joel, Rights, Justice, and the Bounds of Liberty: Essays in Social Philosophy,(Princeton University Press,1980).
    2. Garner, Bryan A, Black’s Law Dictonary 8th Edition, (Thomson West, 2004).
    3. Sperling, Daniel, Posthumous Interests; Legal and Ethical Perspective, (Cambridge University Press, 2008).

    - Articles

    1. Aisha Choong, Katrina & Mifsude Bonnici, Jeanne Pia, “Posthumous Medical Confidentiality”, European Journal of Comparative Law ans Governance, Vol. 1,(2014).
    2. ASHG statement, “Professional disclosure of familial genetic information, The American Society of Human Genetics Social Issues Subcommittee on Familial Disclosure”, American Journal of Human Genet, Vol. 62,(1998).
    3. Berg, Jessica, “Grave Secrets: Legal and Ethical Analysis of Postmortem Confidentiality”, Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 34,(2001).
    4. Blightman K, Griffiths SE & Danbury C, “Patient confidentiality: when can a breach be justified?”, Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain, Vol. 14,(2014).
    5. Boles, Jeffrey R, “public access to government death records and attendant privacy concerns”, Cornell J Law Public Policy, Vol. 22, (2012).
    6. Bongers, L.M.H, “Disclosure of Medical Data to Relatives after the Patients’ Death: Recent Legal Developments with Respect to Relatives’ Entitlements in the Netherlands”, European Journal of Health Law, Vol. 18, (2011).
    7. British Medical Association, “Confidentiality and disclosure of health information tool kit”, London: BMA,8, (2009).
    8. British Medical Association, “Access to Health records: Updated to Reflect the General Data Protection Regulation and Data Protection Act 2018”, London: BMA, (2018).
    9. “Case of Éditios Plon v. France”, V.Eur.Ct.H.R.39, (2004).
    10. Donnelly, Mary & McDonagh Maeve, “Keeping the Secrets of the Dead? An Evaluation of the Statutory Framework for Access to Information about Deceased Persons”, Legal Studies, Vol. 31, (2011).
    11. Harbour, Anthony, “Limits of confidentiality”, Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, Vol. 4, (1998).
    12. James, D S & Leadbeatter, S, “Confidentiality, Death and the Doctor”, Journal of Clinical Pathology, Vol. 49, (1996).
    13. Jones C, “The Utilitarian Argument for Medical Confidentiality: A Pilot Study of Patients’ Views”, Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 29, (2003).
    14. Kottow H, Michael, “Medical Confidentiality: An Intransigent and Absolute Obligation”, Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 12, (1986).
    15. Lowe, Marian & Hardy Havens, Debra M, “Privacy and Confidentiality of Health Information”, J Pediatr Health Care, Vol. 12, (1998).
    16. Machacka, Jakub, “Medical Confidentiality: A Comparison of Some Issues in Czech Republic and English Common Law System”, Common Law Review, Vol. 5, (2003).
    17. Maixner, Andrew H & Morin, Karine, “Confidentiality of health information postmortem”, Arch Pathol Lab, Vol. 125, (2001).
    18. Mifsude Bonnici, Jeanne Pia, “Reflections on the Use of Data and Bodily Material of Deceased Person for Medical Research Under Belgain, Dutch and English Law”, European Journal of Comparative Law ans Governance, Vol. 1, (2014).
    19. Nicholas, Nick & Nicholas Sotiris, “Understanding Confidentiality and the Law on Access to Medical Records”, Obstetrics Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine, Vol. 20, (2010).
    20. Papadodima, Stavroula. A, Spiliopoulou, Chara. A & Sakelliadis, Emmanouil. L, “Medical Confidentiality: Legal and Ethical Aspects in Greece”, Bioethics, Vol. 22, (2008).
    21. Parkin, Elizabeth & Loft, Philip, “Patient Health Records: Access, Sharing and Confidentiality”, House of Commons Library, (2020).
    22. Pitcher, George, “The Misfortune of the Dead”, American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 21, (1984).
    23. Ploem, C. C, “Medical confidentiality after patient's death, with particular reference to the Netherlands”, Medicine and Law, Vol. 20, (2001).
    24. Saunders, John, “Confidentiality”, Medicine, Vol. 44, (2016).
    25. Slowther, Anne-Marie, “Sharing Information in Health Care: The Nature ans Limits of confidentiality”, Clinical Ethics, Vol. 1, (2006).
    26. Smolensky, Kiristen Rabe, “Rights of the Dead”, Hofstra Law Review, Vol. 37, (2009).
    27. Van Bogaert, D Knapp & Ogunbanjo GA, “Human immunodeficiency virus: confidentiality and disclosure of information to third partie”, South African Family Practice, Vol. 53, (2011).
    28. Wener, Leif, “The Nature of Rights”, Wiley, Vol. 33, (2005).
    29. Werth, James L. & Bruke, Caroline & Bardash, Rebekah J, “Confidentiality in End-of-Life and After-Death Situations”, Ethics Behav, Vol. 12, (2002).
Jurisprudence and Islamic Law
Volume 13, Issue 26
March 2022
Pages 269-300

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics