Although in enforcement of pecuniary judgments, resort to seizure of property for security or execution is the main method, and the resort to judgment debtor’s detainment cannot free the judgment creditor from it, this method is not perfect because there is an almost hidden rational principle in the civil judgments enforcement act according to which judgment creditor deserves to acquire judgment debt solely from the property seized for security or execution. This principle can be extended to the acquisition of judgment debt from the mortgaged substance. Few exemptions of this principle i.e. possibility of converting the property primarily seized for security or execution to another property’s seizure, possibility of converting the property secondarily seized for security or execution to another property’s seizure, possibility of converting the seizure of salary and privileges for security or execution to another property’s seizure, possibility of converting the property claimed by a third person to another property, and possibility of converting the unsold property to another property cannot always relieve the judgment creditor from restrictions caused by the above-mentioned principle. As a result, that principle in fact means the principle of non-convertibility of property seized for security or execution and is extendable to the mortgaged property and in contrast to what plaintiff or judgment creditor or their legal agents may suppose, hesitant and non-clever seizure of property for security or execution is not so useful and it may eventually cause serious problems on the way of enforcing the judgment.
پهلوزاده، عباس و نظری، علی، «آثار حقوقی انتقال مال توقیف شده.» مجلۀ حقوقی دادگستری دورۀ جدید، ش 61 (1386).
حکیمی تهرانی، محمدمهدی، «بررسی شرایط، احکام و آثار توقیف اموال غیرمنقول.» معرفت حقوقی 1، ش 1 (1390).
دریایی، رضا و نوروزی محمد، «بررسی تطبیقی نظام دستور موقت در حقوق مالکیت صنعتی ایران و موافقتنامۀ تریپس»، پژوهشهای حقوق تطبیقی 16، ش 1 (1391).
دشتی، رحمت، «بررسی آثار مترتب بر توثیق سهام در حقوق انگلستان و ایران»، فصلنامۀ بورس اوراق بهادار 3، ش 10 (1389).
قلیزاده، احد، «تحلیل حقوقی تأمین دعوای واهی در امور حسبی» فصلنامۀ مطالعات حقوق خصوصی 46، ش 2 (1395).
محسنی، حسن و رضایینژاد، همایون، «شکایت ثالث از عملیات اجرایی» در مقایسه با «اعتراض ثالث به رای».» مجلۀ حقوق خصوصی 8، ش 1 (1390).
- Books
Akhlaghi, Behruz, “Iran”, In International Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, by Paul Hopkins, 229-239. (New York: Yorkhill Law Publishing, 2005).
Blum, Brian A, Bankruptcy and Debtor/Creditor. (New York: Aspen Publishers, 2006).
Brindle, Pilar and Antonio Bravo, “Spain”, In International Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, by Paul Hopkins, 329-350. )New York: Yorkhill Law Publishing, 2005).
Holloway, Patrick and Bradley Edas Webber Wentzel, “South Africa”, In Enforcement of Judgments, Awards & Deeds in Commercial Matters, by Carel J.H. van Lynden, 271-289, (London: Europe Lawyer Reference, 2013).
Hopkins, Paul, “England and Wales” In International Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, by Paul Hopkins, 152-176, (New York: Yorkhill Law Publishiing, 2006).
Kennett, W.A, Enforcement of Judgments in Europe. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).
Nixon, Mary Anne, On your own North Carolina small claims court - A debt collection guide for North Carolina businesses. (North Carolina: Upublish.com, (1998).
Osborne, Craig, Civil Litigation, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).
Sherman, Tawni J, “Superseding and Staying Judgments in Utah” In Superseding and Staying Judgments - A National compendium, by Roger D. Townsend, 491-497, )Chicago: ABA Publishing, 2007).
Subrin, Stephen N., and Margaret Y. K, Litigation in America - Civil Procedure in Context, )New York: Aspen Publishers, 2006).
Vrellos, John, and George Scorinis, “Greece”, In Enforement of Judgments, Awards & Deeds in Commercial Matters, by Carel J.H. van Lynden, 127-145, (London: European Lawyer Reference, 2013).
Gholizadeh Manghutay, A. (2021). A Legal Analysis to the Principle on Non-Convertibility of the Property Seized for Security or Execution and its Exceptions. Jurisprudence and Islamic Law, 12(25), 163-189. doi: 10.22034/law.2021.42724.2758
MLA
Ahad Gholizadeh Manghutay. "A Legal Analysis to the Principle on Non-Convertibility of the Property Seized for Security or Execution and its Exceptions". Jurisprudence and Islamic Law, 12, 25, 2021, 163-189. doi: 10.22034/law.2021.42724.2758
HARVARD
Gholizadeh Manghutay, A. (2021). 'A Legal Analysis to the Principle on Non-Convertibility of the Property Seized for Security or Execution and its Exceptions', Jurisprudence and Islamic Law, 12(25), pp. 163-189. doi: 10.22034/law.2021.42724.2758
VANCOUVER
Gholizadeh Manghutay, A. A Legal Analysis to the Principle on Non-Convertibility of the Property Seized for Security or Execution and its Exceptions. Jurisprudence and Islamic Law, 2021; 12(25): 163-189. doi: 10.22034/law.2021.42724.2758