Security Right against Intellectual Property under UNCITRAL Model Law on Secured Transactions and Iranian Law

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor, University of Tehran

2 PhD Student in Private Law at Kharazmi University, Tehran,

Abstract

Under UNCITRAL model, law on secured transaction creation security right against intellectual property has been allowed. References in the model law to intellectual property are to be understood as references to intellectual property rights of an owner of intellectual property. The essence of the rights of an owner is the right to transfer its intellectual property, the right to prevent unauthorized use of its intellectual property and to pursue infringers, the right to register intellectual property and renew registrations, the right to authorize others to use or exploit the intellectual property and the right to collect royalties. Security right arises from security agreement. Under security right, owner of intellectual property provides these rights to secure an obligation. Although all intellectual property rights have a financial value and can be secured from the point of view of the model law, this law provides for two types of rights that have commercial and economic value, including the right to transfer intellectual property and the right to authorize others to use or exploit the intellectual property. It becomes intellectual property to third parties. There is no method in Iranian law similar to the method of the UNCITRAL Model Law for the authentication of intellectual property. It seems that the rules of the UNCITRAL Model Law can be used to legislate in Iranian law.

Keywords

References

  1. الف) فارسی

    - کتاب‌ها

    1. صالحی ذهابی، جمال، حق اختراع: نگرشی تطبیقی، (تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار، چ 1، 1388).
    2. میرحسینی، سید حسن، حقوق علائم تجاری، (تهران: میزان، چ 1، 1390).
    3. جعفری لنگرودی، محمدجعفر، حقوق مدنی: رهن و صلح، (تهران: گنج دانش، چ 1، 1378).
    4. حکمت‌نیا، محمود، مبانی مالکیت فکری، (تهران: انتشارات پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و اندیشه اسلامی، چ 1، 1386).
    5. شهیدی، مهدی، تشکیل قراردادها و تعهدات، (تهران، مجد. چ 5، 1385 ).

    - مقالات

    1. محمودی، اصغر، «رهن اموال فکری در پرتو مقررات قانون مدنی و مطالعۀ تطبیقی»، پژوهشهای حقوق تطبیقی، ش 1 (1391).
    2. عباسی‌منش، حمیدرضا؛ صادقی، محمود؛ پارساپور، محمدباقر؛ صاحب، طیبه، «توثیق نرم‌افزار (مطالعۀ تطبیقی در الحاقیۀ آنسیترال در خصوص توثیق اموال فکری، قانون متحدالشکل تجاری امریکا و حقوق ایران)»، پژوهش‌های حقوق تطبیقی، ش 4 (1397).
    3. پیلوار، رحیم، «مفهوم اموال فکری در حقوق اموال و جایگاه آن»، مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی. ش 12 (1394).
    4. طجرلو، رضا و شعبانی کندسری، هادی، «وثیقۀ شناور در نظام حقوقی کامن‌لا»، مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، ش 1 (1393).
    5. کریمی، عباس و معین‌الاسلام، محمد، «رهن اموال فکری»، فصلنامۀ حقوق، ش 2 (1387).
    6. حبیبا، سعید و شعبانی کندسری، هادی، «جستاری نقادانه پیرامون دلایل لزوم عینیّت مورد رهن»، مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی، ش 12 (1394).
    7. باقری، محمود، جعفری چالشتری، محمود، «تحلیل اقتصادی رهن اموال فکری»، تحقیقات حقوقی، ش 62 (1392).

    ب) انگلیسی

    - Books

    1. Aram, Sinnreich, The Essential Guide to Intellectual Property, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1nd Ed, 2019).
    2. Carlos, Correa & Xavier, Seuba, Intellectual Property and Development-Understanding the Interfaces, (Singapore: Springer Nature Pte Ltd ,1nd Ed, 2019).
    3. Eva-Maria, Kieninger, Security Rights in Movable Property in European Private Law, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1nd Ed, 2004).
    4. Hannan, Neil, Cross-Border Insolvency The Enactment and Interpretation of the UNCITRAL Model Law, (Singapore: Springer, 1nd Ed, 2017)
    5. Hugh, Beale & Michael, Bridge & Louise, Gullifer & Eva, Lomnicka, The Law of Security and Title-Based Financing, (New York: Oxford University Press, 3nd Ed, 2012).
    6. Janet M, Tavakoli, Structured Finance and Collateralized Debt Obligations New Developments in Cash and Synthetic Securitization, (New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2nd Ed, 2008).
    7. Nancy, Kubasek & Linda, Barkacs & Lucien, Dhooge & Daniel, Herron & M. Neil Browne, Dynamic business law, (New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 4nd Ed, 2017).
    8. Philipp ,Sandner, The Valuation of Intangible Assets: An Exploration of Patent and Trademark Portfolios, (Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler, 1nd Ed, 2010).
    9. Raymond, Westbrook & Richard, Security for Debt in Ancient Near Eastern Law, (Boston: Brill Academic Publishers, 1nd Ed, 2001).
    10. Ting, Xu, & Jean, Allain, Property and Human Rights in a Global Context, (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1nd Ed, 2016).
    11. World Bank Group, Secured-Transactions-Collateral-Registries-and-Movable-Asset-Based-Financing, (Washington: WORLD BANK Publishing, 1nd Ed, 2019)
    12. UNCITRAL, UNCITRAL Legislative Guide on Secured Transactions, (New York, United Nations, 1nd Ed, 2010).
    13. UNCITRAL, UNCITRAL Legislative Guide on Secured Transactions Supplement on Security Rights in Intellectual Property, (New York, United Nations: 1nd Ed, 2016).
    14. UNCITRAL, UNCITRAL Model Law on Secured Transactions Guide to Enactment, (Vienna: United Nations, 1nd Ed, 2017).

    - Articles

    1. Andrea, Tosato, “Security interests over intellectual property”, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 6 (2011).
    2. Sarnelli, Jennifer, “Grasping for Air: Revised Article 9 and Intellectual Property in an Electronic World”, UCLA Entertainment Law Review, Vol. 11 (2004).
    3. William J. Murphy, “Proposal for a Centralized and Integred and Integrated Registr ated Registry for Security y for Security Interests in Intellectual Property”, The Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 41 (2002).
    4. Xuan, Thao Nguyen, “Collateralizing Intellectual Property”, Georgia La Review, Vol. 42 (2007).
Jurisprudence and Islamic Law
Volume 12, Issue 25
December 2021
Pages 1-28

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics