The Source of the Obligation to Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment in Turkey Gap Project

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 . PhD in International Law, Qom University

2 Master of International Law, Qom University

3 . Associate Professor, Qom University

Abstract

Turkey, as an upstream state in the Tigris and Euphrates Basin, has initiated a project called Southeast Anatolia Project (GAP) since 1936. It has begun to build numerous dams and hydroelectric power plants on the Tigris and the Euphrates River since 1977. Considering that the implementation of this project has had and will have numerous environmental, social and economic impacts on the surrounding countries i.e., Iraq, Syria and Iran and according to experts, Turkey has not performed the environmental impact assessment process of this project correctly, the question is whether Turkey has a binding international obligation from the international law perspective to implement its commitment to environmental impact assessment. The results of this article show that, given to the international documents and procedures, today's commitment to conduct environmental impact assessment in projects that have the potential to create significant transboundary damage has been known as a mandatory customary commitment and it is necessary for all countries. Thus, Turkey was also obliged to carry out this task in the implementation of the Gap project, which by failing to comply, it has international responsibility.

Keywords

References

  1. منابع و مآخذ

    الف) فارسی

    - کتاب‌ها

    1. اردو، سارا، «ساخت سد ایلیسو در ترکیه در تضاد حقوق بین‌الملل»، دیپلماسی ایرانی، ۱۳۹۶: <http://irdiplomacy.ir/fa/news/1969520/>
    2. اکبری، نرگس و علی مشهدی، «تهدیدها و تعهدات زیست‌محیطی دولت ترکیه در اجرای پروژۀ گاپ نسبت به آثار سوء زیست‌محیطی در ایران»، مجلۀ حقوقی بین‌المللی، ش 61 (1398).
    3. بنی‌حبیب، محمدابراهیم؛ نجفی مرغملکی، سجاد؛ و محمدرضا پورطبری، محسن، «بررسی عوامل بروز گرد و غبار در غرب و جنوب کشور با تمرکز بر دلایل خشک شدن تالاب هورالعظیم و ارائۀ راهکارهایی برای احیای آن»، ششمین کنفرانس ملی مدیریت منابع آب ایران با رویکرد: پیوند اکولوژیکی با چرخۀ آب برای پایداری سرزمین، دانشگاه کردستان ( 1-3 اردیبهشت 1395).
    4. سالاری، اسماء، «ارزیابی اثرات زیست‌محیطی فرامرزی در حقوق بین‌الملل»، مطالعات حقوق عمومی، ش 50 (4) (1399).
    5. سلطان قیس، فرید و حسین علیزاده، «احداث سد ایلیسو در ترکیه و مغایرت آن با تعهدات فرامرزی در قبال همسایگان وفق حقوق بین‌الملل»،علوم و فنون مرزی، ش ۸(۴) (1396).
    6. قائم‌مقامی، علی، «بحران آب و آب‌های جاری فرامرزی ترکیه و امنیت ملی و محیط‌زیست ایران»، فصلنامۀ مطالعات منافع ملی، سال دوم، ش 7 (۱۳۹۶).
    7. میان‌آبادی، حجت، «ملاحظات سیاسی و امنیتی و حقوقی در مدیریت رودخانه‌های فرامرزی»، فصلنامۀ پژوهش‌های روابط بین‌الملل، ش ۱(۹) (1392).

    ب) انگلیسی

    1. Advisory Opinion on Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area, ITLOS Case No 17 (‘Sponsoring States Advisory Opinion’), (2011).
    2.  ASEAN Agreement on the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Kuala Lumpur, (1985).
    3. Ayboga, Ercan, “Policy and Impacts of Dams in the Euphrates and Tigris Basin”, Paper for the Mesopotamia Water Forum Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan Region of Iraq, (2019).
    4. Bendel, J. and Harrison, J, “Determining the Legal Nature and Content of EIAs in International Environmental Law: What Does the ICJ Decision in the Joined Costa Rica v Nicaragua/Nicaragua v Costa Rica Cases Tell Us?”, Questions of International Law, 42 (2017).
    5. Bilgen, Arda, “The Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP) in Turkey: An Alternative Perspective on the major Rationales of GAP”, Journal oF Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 21(5) (2019).
    6. Bremer, Nicolas C, “Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment of Large Dams in the Euphrates–Tigris Region: An Analysis of International Law Binding Iran, Iraq, Syria and Turkey”, RECIEL 25 (1) (2016).
    7. Convention on Biological Diversity, (1992).
    8. Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context, (1991).
    9. Convention on the Law of Non- Navigational Uses of International Watercourses, (UN Watercourses Convention), (1997).
    10.  Convention on the protection and use of transboundary watercourses and international lakes, (1992).
    11. Financial Tribune, “Imminent Danger of Turkish Dam for Iran, Iraq”,(2019): <https://financialtribune.com/articles/environment/76236/imminent-danger-of-turkish-dam-for-iran-iraq >.
    12. Gillespie, Alexander, “Environmental Impact Assessments in International Law”, RECIEL, 17 (2) (2008).
    13. ICJ, Construction of a Road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica); Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaraguain the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua), Judgment, (2015).
    14. ICJ, Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina/Uruguay), Judgment, (2010).
    15. ICJ, The Situation in Accordance with Paragraph 63 of the Court’s Judgment of 20 December 1974 in the Nuclear Tests, (1995).
    16. ILC, Draft articles on Prevention of Transboundary Harm from Hazardous Activities, (2001).
    17. International Law Association (ILA), Berlin Rules on Water Resources, (2004).
    18. Lossow, Tobias von, “More than Infrastructures: Water Challenges in Iraq”, Clingendael Policy Brief, 2018: <https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/2018-07/PB_PSI_water_challenges_Iraq.pdf>.
    19. Okowa, Phoebe. N, “Procedural Obligations in International Environmental Agreements”, British Yearbook of International Law, 67(1) (1996).
    20. PCA, Case Concerning the South China dispute between Philippine and China, (2016).
    21. Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty, (1991).
    22. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, (1992).
    23. Ruozzi, Elisa, “The Obligation to Undertake an Environmental Assessment in the Jurisprudence of the ICJ: A Principle in Search for Autonomy”, European Journal of Risk Regulation, 8 (2017).
    24. Savaresi, Annalisa, “Environmental Impact Assessment after the International Court of Justice decision in Costa Rica-Nicaragua and Nicaragua-Costa Rica: Looking backward, looking forward”, QIL, Zoom-in 42 (2017).
    25. Shamout, Nouar, M. and Glada Lahn, “The Euphrates in Crisis Channels of Cooperation for a Threatened River”, Research Paper, Chatham House, (2015):

    <https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/field/field_document/20150413Euphrates_0.pdf>.

    1. Treaty of Friendship and Good Neighborly Relations between Turkey and Iraq, (1946).
    2. UNECE Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment to the Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context, (2003).
    3. UNEP, “UNEP Goals and Principles of Environmental Impact Assessment”, (1987).
    4. UN-ESCWA, “Inventory of Shared Water Resources in Western Asia”, Chapter 1: Euphrates River Basin, (2013).
    5. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), (1992).
    6. Winton, R. Scott; Calamita, Elisa & Bernhard Wehrli, “Reviews and Syntheses:Dams, Water Quality and Tropical Reservoir Stratification”, Biogeosciences Discuss, (2019):

    <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330092286_Reviews_and_syntheses_Dams_water_quality_and_tropical_reservoir_stratification/link/5c2cf442299bf12be3a847df/download>.

    1. Yang, Tesming, “The Emergence of the Environmental Impact Assessment Duty as a Global Legal Norm and General Principle of Law”, Hastings Law Journal, 75(525) (2019).

    ج) فرانسوی

    40. Al-Dbiyat Mohamed et Michel Mouton (éd.), Stratégies d'acquisition de l'eau et société au Moyen-Orient depuis l'Antiquité. (Beyrouth: Presses de l’Ifpo, 2009).

    41. Bazin, Marcel et Stéphane de Tapia, “ Le Projet de l’Anatolie du Sud-Est (GAP) dans son contexte national turc et régional moyen-oriental”, Bulletin de l’association de géographes français. Géographies, No. 92-2 (2015).

    42. Bischoff, Damien, et Jean-François Pérouse, “La question des barrages et du GAP dans le Sud-Est anatolien: patrimoines en danger?”,Institut français d'études anatoliennes Georges Dumézil, (2003).

    43. Clus, Owen, “Condenseurs radiatifs de la vapeur d'eau atmosphérique (rosée) comme source alternative d'eau douce”,Diss. (2007).

    44. Dantin, Michel, “L'eau douce dans le monde. Comment gérer un bien commun? L’action de l’Europe”, Annales des Mines–Responsabilité et environnement, N° 2(86) (2017).

    45. Gadelle, François, “Le monde manquera-t-il bientôt d’eau?”, Science et changements planétaires/Sécheresse, N° 6(1) (1995).

    46. Mallet, Laurent, “Le Projet du sud-est anatolien (GAP): conflits autour d’un projet de développement”,Les conflits dans le monde. Armand Colin, Chapitre 16, (2011).

    47. Mazzucchi, Valeria Maria, “Le droit international des cours d'eau et les effets des grands barrages dans le Sud-Est anatolien”, Le Tigre, l’Euphrate et le barrage Ilısu”. Diss. University of Geneva, (2015).

    48. Picard, Elizabeth, “Les problèmes de l'eau au Moyen-Orient: désinformation, crise de gestion et instrumentalisation politique”, Maghreb, Machrek, Monde arabe, No. 138 (1992).

Jurisprudence and Islamic Law
Volume 12, Issue 22
March 2021
Pages 117-144

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics