<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Jurisprudence and Islamic Law</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>28210891</Issn>
				<Volume>8</Volume>
				<Issue>15</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2017</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Civil Liability for Unknown Risks of Product in Iranian Law and Emamiyeh Jurisprudence</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Civil Liability for Unknown Risks of Product in Iranian Law and Emamiyeh Jurisprudence</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>21</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>49</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">7740</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ahmad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Deylami</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Law School of Qom</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyyed Ruhollah</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ghasemzadeh</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D  in Private Law, University of Qom</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2017</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>16</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Civil liability for unknown risks of new products that are called “development risks” is one of the most important discussions of product liability. These risks arise from deficiency of human science and that is why it may be supposed that producer is exonerated from liability for unknown risk. However, despite the silence of the Iranian legislator and jurisprudential sources, in order to protect consumer against unknown risks, the authors have attempted to prove that producer’s liability for unknown risks is justifiable both in Iranian law and Imamiyeh (Shiite) jurisprudence. The most important pieces of evidence include defectiveness of product for unknown risks, customary attribution of defect to incurred loss, ineffectiveness of foreseeability element in civil liability, Asalat- O- Salama (principle of product’s perfect quality), Ghonm rule )one who profits must compensate) and no loss rule. However, these pieces of evidence are somewhat controversial and can be relied upon only by special interpretation of certain concepts. Generally, authors’ interpretation is focused on Iranian law and Emamiyeh jurisprudence. This article consists of two main parts; in first part, the authors have addressed the concept of unknown risks and legal - jurisprudential bases of liability for unknown risks, and in the second part, they have further clarified these pieces of evidence. As a conclusion, the authors suggest some mechanisms in order to protect consumers against unknown risks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Civil liability for unknown risks of new products that are called “development risks” is one of the most important discussions of product liability. These risks arise from deficiency of human science and that is why it may be supposed that producer is exonerated from liability for unknown risk. However, despite the silence of the Iranian legislator and jurisprudential sources, in order to protect consumer against unknown risks, the authors have attempted to prove that producer’s liability for unknown risks is justifiable both in Iranian law and Imamiyeh (Shiite) jurisprudence. The most important pieces of evidence include defectiveness of product for unknown risks, customary attribution of defect to incurred loss, ineffectiveness of foreseeability element in civil liability, Asalat- O- Salama (principle of product’s perfect quality), Ghonm rule )one who profits must compensate) and no loss rule. However, these pieces of evidence are somewhat controversial and can be relied upon only by special interpretation of certain concepts. Generally, authors’ interpretation is focused on Iranian law and Emamiyeh jurisprudence. This article consists of two main parts; in first part, the authors have addressed the concept of unknown risks and legal - jurisprudential bases of liability for unknown risks, and in the second part, they have further clarified these pieces of evidence. As a conclusion, the authors suggest some mechanisms in order to protect consumers against unknown risks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Product Defect</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Unknown Risks</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Customary Attribution</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Civil Liability</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Jurisprudents</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://law.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_7740_f15d211a5c520f706ced4ca3298e1702.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
