<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Jurisprudence and Islamic Law</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>28210891</Issn>
				<Volume>8</Volume>
				<Issue>14</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2017</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The concept and fundamental of the infraction in the
principle of innocence</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The concept and fundamental of the infraction in the
principle of innocence</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>29</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">7168</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abbas Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Akbari</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. Student of Criminal Law and Criminology, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mahmoud</FirstName>
					<LastName>Malmir</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hassan</FirstName>
					<LastName>Pourbafrani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Law, University of Isfahan</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2017</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The principle of the criminal exoneration is one the main factors of the&lt;br /&gt;disciplinary justice and legal procedure so that according to this principle, all&lt;br /&gt;people of society are considered as innocence unless their accusation is to be&lt;br /&gt;more than a reasonable thought with respect to the law and proven in a related&lt;br /&gt;trial. This principle of the criminal exoneration in some criminal cases is a part&lt;br /&gt;of the principle. In this article, we are intended to find out an answer to the&lt;br /&gt;question whether the concept and effect of infraction in the principle of&lt;br /&gt;exoneration and fundamental and reasons of the criminal is the same orientation&lt;br /&gt;with the principle. In the first part of the principle, after clarifying the concept of&lt;br /&gt;the principle and criminal presumption and its impact, we come to this&lt;br /&gt;conclusion that the criminal presumption in the contrast with the exoneration,&lt;br /&gt;the verification of accusation comes to an opposite result. It is the main duty of&lt;br /&gt;the criminal to offer evidence for proving his innocence. such as organized&lt;br /&gt;crime, crimes related to terrorist acts, proceeds from drug trafficking and money&lt;br /&gt;laundering, being suspicious in the crime, the responsibility of suspicion calling&lt;br /&gt;of another person at night out of his residence, membership in a group or a&lt;br /&gt;population whose aim is to disrupt the security of the country. In the second&lt;br /&gt;part of this article, my main concepts and reasons of infraction are concerned&lt;br /&gt;with the necessity of pragmatism and preserving the society benefits, easiness of&lt;br /&gt;proving the complicated and dangerous crimes and establishing an equality&lt;br /&gt;between the parties and considering the economic, security and some especial&lt;br /&gt;condition of the society and legal equality in performing the legal procedure of&lt;br /&gt;criminals. Therefore, we should not ignore the fact that in the performance of&lt;br /&gt;equality and saving the social order and people&#039;s rights should not be considered&lt;br /&gt;as a main framework in the performance of the legal procedure and the&lt;br /&gt;infraction of the principle of exoneration and criminal presumption is&lt;br /&gt;exceptional fact and it is justifiable only through the law, and in this case, there&lt;br /&gt;should be a possibility of proving the opposite side of the principle.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The principle of the criminal exoneration is one the main factors of the&lt;br /&gt;disciplinary justice and legal procedure so that according to this principle, all&lt;br /&gt;people of society are considered as innocence unless their accusation is to be&lt;br /&gt;more than a reasonable thought with respect to the law and proven in a related&lt;br /&gt;trial. This principle of the criminal exoneration in some criminal cases is a part&lt;br /&gt;of the principle. In this article, we are intended to find out an answer to the&lt;br /&gt;question whether the concept and effect of infraction in the principle of&lt;br /&gt;exoneration and fundamental and reasons of the criminal is the same orientation&lt;br /&gt;with the principle. In the first part of the principle, after clarifying the concept of&lt;br /&gt;the principle and criminal presumption and its impact, we come to this&lt;br /&gt;conclusion that the criminal presumption in the contrast with the exoneration,&lt;br /&gt;the verification of accusation comes to an opposite result. It is the main duty of&lt;br /&gt;the criminal to offer evidence for proving his innocence. such as organized&lt;br /&gt;crime, crimes related to terrorist acts, proceeds from drug trafficking and money&lt;br /&gt;laundering, being suspicious in the crime, the responsibility of suspicion calling&lt;br /&gt;of another person at night out of his residence, membership in a group or a&lt;br /&gt;population whose aim is to disrupt the security of the country. In the second&lt;br /&gt;part of this article, my main concepts and reasons of infraction are concerned&lt;br /&gt;with the necessity of pragmatism and preserving the society benefits, easiness of&lt;br /&gt;proving the complicated and dangerous crimes and establishing an equality&lt;br /&gt;between the parties and considering the economic, security and some especial&lt;br /&gt;condition of the society and legal equality in performing the legal procedure of&lt;br /&gt;criminals. Therefore, we should not ignore the fact that in the performance of&lt;br /&gt;equality and saving the social order and people&#039;s rights should not be considered&lt;br /&gt;as a main framework in the performance of the legal procedure and the&lt;br /&gt;infraction of the principle of exoneration and criminal presumption is&lt;br /&gt;exceptional fact and it is justifiable only through the law, and in this case, there&lt;br /&gt;should be a possibility of proving the opposite side of the principle.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Principle of innocence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">criminality presumption</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">infraction of innocence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">proof burden</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">weapons equality</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://law.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_7168_1ccb2936fa86c1108024def732f3d88a.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
