University of Tabriz Jurisprudence and Islamic Law 28210891 5 8 2014 08 23 Interference of causes and inducements in Jurisprudence and statute Interference of causes and inducements in Jurisprudence and statute 93 117 3184 FA Khalil Queblehi Khuyi Assistant Professor, Judicial Sciences University. Hadi Shabani Kandsari M.A. in Private law, Judicial Sciences University. Mohammadreza Dashti M.A. in Private law, Judicial Sciences University Journal Article 2015 02 14 Multiplicity of provision and unity of result and its outcome which is<br />interference or non-interference of causes and inducements was studied<br />in Jurisprudence and statute in this article. The purpose of this article<br />was removal of conflict in provisional sentences in which there is<br />multiplicity of provision and unity of result and determination of dictum<br />of those provisional sentences from the viewpoint of interference or noninterference<br />of causes and inducements. The outcome was that for<br />removal of conflict in these provisional sentences it should be taken into<br />account that causes and inducements wouldn’t basically interfere,<br />whether the result is repeatable or not, unless there would be a reason for<br />interference. As a rule in statutes, it should be said that in various cases<br />when provision is multiple and result is the same, every provision,<br />without relying on others, causes the result to come into being, unless its<br />contrary is proven. Multiplicity of provision and unity of result and its outcome which is<br />interference or non-interference of causes and inducements was studied<br />in Jurisprudence and statute in this article. The purpose of this article<br />was removal of conflict in provisional sentences in which there is<br />multiplicity of provision and unity of result and determination of dictum<br />of those provisional sentences from the viewpoint of interference or noninterference<br />of causes and inducements. The outcome was that for<br />removal of conflict in these provisional sentences it should be taken into<br />account that causes and inducements wouldn’t basically interfere,<br />whether the result is repeatable or not, unless there would be a reason for<br />interference. As a rule in statutes, it should be said that in various cases<br />when provision is multiple and result is the same, every provision,<br />without relying on others, causes the result to come into being, unless its<br />contrary is proven. https://law.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_3184_be977642c44ba5ecf18fb7c002fada2f.pdf