<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Jurisprudence and Islamic Law</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>28210891</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>5</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2012</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Aircraft and Its Spare Part Manufacturer's Liability for
Damages to Third Parties</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Aircraft and Its Spare Part Manufacturer&#039;s Liability for
Damages to Third Parties</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>22</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2090</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mansour</FirstName>
					<LastName>Jabbari</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor, Law and Political science faculty of Allameh Tabatabaei University</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Amaneh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Shoshtari</LastName>
<Affiliation>L.L.M student in International Commercial Law,, Allameh Tabatabaei University.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2011</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>16</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;span id=&quot;docs-internal-guid-eca1b909-7fff-22a9-6fe0-ee305f380caf&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;&quot;Defect&quot; in an aircraft manufacturer&#039;s liability, has completely different meaning from &quot;Defect&quot; in the law of contracts. In the first one, a product will be defective, when it is not lawfully safe. We recognized four kinds of defect in an aircraft: technical defect, defective design, defective manufacture and deficient warning. The manufacturers are certainly liable for their products. Among different kinds of liabilities, this paper illustrates that the strict liability is the best theory in aviation cases: therefore, the plaintiff does not have to prove negligence of the manufacturer. In this article, we studied some technical and legal points in aviation accidents and the law of aircraft manufactures&#039; liability.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">&lt;span id=&quot;docs-internal-guid-eca1b909-7fff-22a9-6fe0-ee305f380caf&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;&quot;Defect&quot; in an aircraft manufacturer&#039;s liability, has completely different meaning from &quot;Defect&quot; in the law of contracts. In the first one, a product will be defective, when it is not lawfully safe. We recognized four kinds of defect in an aircraft: technical defect, defective design, defective manufacture and deficient warning. The manufacturers are certainly liable for their products. Among different kinds of liabilities, this paper illustrates that the strict liability is the best theory in aviation cases: therefore, the plaintiff does not have to prove negligence of the manufacturer. In this article, we studied some technical and legal points in aviation accidents and the law of aircraft manufactures&#039; liability.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Aircraft manufacturer</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Negligence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">strict Liability</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">express and implied warranties</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">aviation accident</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">defect</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://law.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_2090_e4dad922d5c345574111592f09ccbef0.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
