ابطال رأی داوری بر مبنای «دکترین نادیده گرفتن آشکار قانون» در حقوق امریکا؛ با نگاهی به حقوق ایران

الف) فارسی

- کتاب‌ها

1. امامی، سید حسن (1371). حقوق مدنی، تهران: انتشارات اسلامیه.
2. جعفری لنگرودی، محمدجعفر (1397). ترمینولوژی حقوقی، تهران: گنج دانش.
3. جنیدی، لعیا (1395). اجرای آرای داوری بازرگانی خارجی، تهران: شهردانش.
4. حدادی، مهدی (1400). داوری بین المللی در نظام حقوقی ایران، تهران: مجد.
5. خدابخشی، عبدالله (1400). حقوق داوری و دعاوی مربوط به آن در رویۀ قضایی، تهران: شرکت سهامی‌انتشار.
6. شمس، عبدالله (1396). آیین دادرسی مدنی (دورۀ پیشرفته)، تهران: دراک.
7. شیروی، عبدالحسین (1392). داوری تجاری بین‌المللی، تهران: سمت.
8. فضلی، حسن (1400). تحلیل آیین دادرسی و جهات ابطال رأی داوری، تهران: انتشارات دادگستری استان تهران.

- مقالات

9. منصوری، عباس و امینی، عیسی (1400). محدودة نظارت دادگاه بر رأی داوری داخلی از حیث رعایت قوانین موجد حق با تکیه بر رویة قضایی. پژوهش حقوق خصوصی، 10 (36). ص 147-123.  Doi: 10.22054/jplr.2019.43299.2230
10. غمامی، مجید (1401). جستاری تطبیقی در اوصاف نظام دادرسی مطلوب. مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی معاصر، 13 (27). ص 170-149. Doi: 10.22034/law.2021.46656.2929

ب) منابع انگلیسی

-books

• Park, William W. (2006). Arbitration of International Business Disputes, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Rowley QC, J William (2019). The Guide to Challenging and Enforcing Arbitration Awards, London: Law Business Research Ltd.
• Wiliński, Piotr, (2019). Excess of Powers in International Commercial Arbitration, The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.

- Articles

• Aragaki, Hiro N. (2009). The Mess of Manifest Disregard, The Yale Law Journal, 191(1).
• Brown, Matthew J. (2013). Final Awards Reconceptualized: A Proposal to Resolve the Hall Street Circuit Split, Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, 13.
• Burch, Thomas V. (2010). Manifest Disregard and the Imperfect Procedural Justice of Arbitration, Kansas Law Review, 59.
• Chen, Annie (2008). The Doctrine of Manifest Disregard of the Law after Hall Street: Implications for Judicial Review of International Arbitrations in U.S. Courts, Fordham International Law Journal, 32 (6).
• Cole, Sarah Rudolph (2016). Curbing the Runaway Arbitrator in Commercial Arbitration: Making Exceeding the Powers Count, Ohio State Public Law, 344.
• Drahozal, Christopher R. & Ware, Stephen J. (2010). Why do Businesses Use (or not Use) Arbitration Clauses?, Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 25(2).
• Drahozal, Christopher R. (2007). Codifying Manifest Disregard, Nevada Law Journal, 8.
• Graff, David (2008). The Helmsley Case: An Illustration of the Confused State of the Law Surrounding the Manifest Disregard of Law Doctrine as Applied to Arbitration, Touro law review,
• Gross, Jill I. (2099). Hall Street Blues: The Uncertain Future of Manifest Disregard, Securities Regulation Law Journal 37(3).
• Gurian, Nico (2017). Rethinking Judicial Review of Arbitration, Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 50.
• Ha, Choong-Lyong (2020). The Finality of Arbitral Awards: The U.S. Practices, Journal of Arbitration Studies, 30 (3).
• Hayford, Stephen L. (1998). Reining in the Manifest Disregard of the Law Standard: The Key to Restoring Order to the Law of Vacatur, Journal of Dispute Resolution, 1998 (2).
• Kennedy, Kate (2007). Manifest Disregard in Arbitration Awards: A Manifestation of Appeals versus a Disregard for Just Resolutions, Journal of Law and Policy, 16.
• Larson, Caroline (2018). Substantive Fairness in International Commercial Arbitration: Achievable through an Arbitral Appeals Process? Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management, 84 (2).
• O’Mullan, Michael P. (1995). Seeking Consistency in Judicial Review of Securities Arbitration: An Analysis of the Manifest Disregard of the Law Standard, Fordham L. Rev., 64 (3)
• Pivateau, Griffin Toronjo, Reconsidering Arbitration: Evaluating the Future of the Manifest Disregard Standard, Available at:

Doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1649093.  

• Reuben, Richard C. (2009). Personal Autonomy and Vacatur After Hall Street, Penn State Law Review, 113.
• Rubins, Noah (2001). Manifest Disregard of the Law" and Vacatur of Arbitral Awards in the United States, American Review of International Arbitration, 12.
• Sims, MyLinda Kay; Bales, Richard A. (2012). Much Ado About Nothing: The Future of Manifest Disregard after Hall Street, South Carolina Law Review, 62.
• Stinson, Judith M. (2010). Why Dicta Becomes Holding and Why it Matters, Brooklyn law review, 76 (1).
• Strickland, Henry C. (1992). The Federal Arbitration Act's Interstate Commerce Requirement: What's Left for State Arbitration Law? Hofstra Law Review, 21 (2).
• Tompkins, Jonathan J. (2018). Manifest Disregard of the Law: The Continuing Evolution of an Historically Ambiguous Vacatur Standard, Dispute Resolution International, 12 (2).
• Ware, Stephen J. (2014). Vacating Legally-Erroneous Arbitration Awards, Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation 56 (6).
• Weiskopf, Nicholas R. (2007). Arbitral Injustice Rethinking the Manifest Disregard Standard for Judicial Review of Awards, The University of Louisville Law Review, 46.
• Weston, Maureen A. (2010). The Other Avenues of Hall Street and Prospects for Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards, Lewis & Clark Law Review,